fix: clean up copy

[mattrosno]

Content cleanup after reading through primary platform description pages.

Changelog

New

• N/A

Changed

Home page:

• Removed mention of inner source, because we don't index IBM internal resources yet
• Updated descriptions for components, functions, and templates and made them consistent with the schema page descriptions. It was odd how only the component description had an e.g. This also made the description lengths more consistent to prevent widows at common breakpoints.
• Remove unnecessary use of "library" in the first feature card, because the second feature card didn't include "library"
• Changed "makers" to "creators" to align with IBM's "Let's Create"
• Made sure our use of asset type lists was consistent
• Spelled out "Pattern and Asset Library" near the first place that we use the "PAL" acronym

Schema page:

• Updated library and asset descriptions
• Updated asset type descriptions to match what's used in the home page, and so the lengths are more consistent

How Carbon works page:

• Made anchor link headings more consistent (we don't need "Carbon" in every heading)
• Removed code formatting of emphasized words. We don't need to emphasize words.
• Updated definitions to match the above two pages.
• Added more specificity to who maintains the platform, as we specifically state that the system squad maintains a bunch of the libraries.

Library design kits page:

• No need to link out to designer getting started here. We don't link to developer getting started pages elsewhere in a library. Plus, when a library is referenced in local systems, those local systems might have more specific getting started pages for their creators, so it doesn't make sense to link out to the core getting started page here.

Removed

• N/A

Testing / reviewing

Run locally to see the updated pages.

[francinelucca]

LGTM!

[aagonzales]

This looks good from your goal of streamlining content. I had a few comments and suggestions but not any specific corrections, the biggest one being around the design kit description. I'll go ahead and greenlight it though

[aubrey-oneal]

Overall, this is a great clean up. Thanks Matt!

I left notes on some content I'd like to revert back to, each of which were drafted with stakeholder and user feedback. Namely:

• Add component examples back in
• Add examples of Design Kit tools back in
• Add code tags/highlights back in for the How Carbon Works page.

[mattrosno]

@carbon-design-system/carbon-platform-designers can I get another review on this?

[aagonzales]

Ok it looks good to me!

[carbon-bot]

❗ The commits in this PR will result in the following version changes:

🐛 PATCH release: @carbon-platform/web-app

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

I addressed the feedback.