Start supporting struct type literals in lowering. #2822
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
explorer
jonmeow
changed the title
jonmeow
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
chandlerc
reviewed
May 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This currently handles most of struct types and member access, but not values. The value issue is, I think, an underlying semantic IR approach (changed in #2824). I'd still like to get this in in order to ensure I'm creating IR at least reasonably well, but I want to be clear this is expected to be incomplete and is split out mainly to try to keep PRs in reasonable units.