Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a description of groups where we maintain lists of contributors/team members. #6

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 1, 2020

Conversation

jonmeow
Copy link
Contributor

@jonmeow jonmeow commented Apr 30, 2020

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@chandlerc chandlerc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, LGTM with one suggested edit.

docs/project/groups.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@jonmeow jonmeow merged commit be655d3 into master May 1, 2020
@jonmeow jonmeow deleted the access-groups branch May 1, 2020 00:26
vinsdragonis added a commit to Pritjam/carbon-lang that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2022
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
…4253)

There's not much mangling happening yet - but Run -> main (and some
overloading numbering happening, maybe LLVM is doing that 'helpfully'
under the hood?) is enough to demonstrate this improvement/fix.

Ah, here it is:
```
#0  llvm::ValueSymbolTable::makeUniqueName (this=0x50287fe5b6c0, V=0x50287fe827e8, UniqueName="F") at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/ValueSymbolTable.cpp:45
#1  0x000055555c40f964 in llvm::ValueSymbolTable::reinsertValue (this=0x50287fe5b6c0, V=0x50287fe827e8) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/ValueSymbolTable.cpp:100
#2  0x000055555c2a91df in llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Function>::addNodeToList (this=0x50287fd16f18, V=0x50287fe827e8) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/SymbolTableListTraitsImpl.h:75
#3  0x000055555c2a90e5 in llvm::iplist_impl<llvm::simple_ilist<llvm::Function>, llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Function> >::insert (this=0x50287fd16f18, where=..., New=0x50287fe827e8)
    at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:166
#4  0x000055555c27fef2 in llvm::iplist_impl<llvm::simple_ilist<llvm::Function>, llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Function> >::push_back (this=0x50287fd16f18, val=0x50287fe827e8) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:250
#5  0x000055555c27faeb in llvm::Function::Function (this=0x50287fe827e8, Ty=0x50287fd43058, Linkage=llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, AddrSpace=0, name="F", ParentModule=0x50287fd16f00) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:521
#6  0x0000555559441f95 in llvm::Function::Create (Ty=0x50287fd43058, Linkage=llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, AddrSpace=0, N="F", M=0x50287fd16f00) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:175
#7  0x000055555c27ebac in llvm::Function::Create (Ty=0x50287fd43058, Linkage=llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, N="F", M=...) at external/_main~llvm_project~llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:398
#8  0x0000555558ce7bb5 in Carbon::Lower::FileContext::BuildFunctionDecl (this=0x7fffffffc438, function_id=...) at toolchain/lower/file_context.cpp:257
```

That's where LLVM decides to make a new name (name.number) when asked to
create a new global with the same name as an existing global.

It's not a valid mangling scheme - since the name won't be stable
between different compilations, but it is enough to make
single-compilation code build/run for now.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants