You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@@ -102,4 +102,4 @@ While the benchmark shows execution time is roughly linear as the number of item
To confirm this hypothesis, the "Variance benchmark" runs prover with _different_ set of data for _same_ number of items. Running ALBA prover on 10 different lists of 5000 items yields also varying running time, with a difference of a factor 2 between slowest and fastest. Again, this is explanable by the "random" nature of the data: Different lists can lead to different traversal of the tree when constructing the proof, some requiring more hashes than others.
All these numbers were obtained on a single [C2 4 CPUs, 16GB Ram](https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/compute-optimized-machines#c2_series) machine from Google Cloud running Ubuntu 22.04.
All these numbers were obtained on a single [C2, 4 CPUs, 16GB Ram](https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/compute-optimized-machines#c2_series) machine from Google Cloud running Ubuntu 22.04.
