Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent language about what to do when checks fail #18

Closed
cabo opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Inconsistent language about what to do when checks fail #18

cabo opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@cabo
Copy link
Collaborator

cabo commented Jul 24, 2024

Archived-At: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/IwZBL1Q522pZA3pIJfo5WJ0YVtY
cabo added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
@cabo
Fix #17, address #18, add "Basic Serialization"
7a74d2e
cabo added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
@cabo
Merge pull request #19 from cbor-wg/basic-serialization
374be67 
Fix #17, address #18, add "Basic Serialization"
Merging for use in IETF120 CBOR meeting.
@cabo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cabo commented Jul 25, 2024

Let's check whether the changes in #19 suffice and we can close this

@cabo cabo closed this as completed in b29ede3 Nov 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cabo