Disable natural language check in super-linter workflow

[jeancochrane]

The lint workflow runs super-linter, which enables the terminology rule for the textlint linter. Per the super-linter
textlint template, this is actually the only rule that super-linter enables for textlint. Super-linter calls this the "natural language" check.

I find the terminology rule unhelpful, in that it mostly just fails CI for my PRs due to small nitpicks like the use of "website" instead of "site" or "repo" instead of "repository". See this failed workflow run for an example. If we were publishing docs that needed to adhere to a strict styleguide, I might find this helpful, but instead I think it just slows down our velocity without clarifying our writing very much. As such, this PR disables textlint, and therefore the terminology rule, in our super-linter config.

See the terminology rule code for the list of replacements that this PR will disable. There doesn't seem to be a page for these replacements in the docs, so reading the code is indeed the recommended way of browsing them.

See this workflow run for evidence of the Natural Language check not running, and the super-linter workflow passing in spite of the presence of website and repo in the README.

My opinion about the helpfulness of this change is weakly held, so I'm open to pushback if either of you feel strongly that we should keep the natural language check!

[dfsnow]

I'm fine with this and find myself annoyed with the same spelling nitpicks. Let's nix it.