Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
Hi @Peku995 Which platform do you use? macOS? Linux? You should not need the Intel runtime library if you do not use the parallel MPI version. You may have to rebuild the library for Mac M1 and M2 architectures, but the binaries in the latest release should work just fine with macOS amd64 architecture. Please update so I can escalate this discussion into an issue for resolution. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just tested the library in MATLAB 2023, and it successfully finished the simulation. Here is an example output graph from the simulation I just did by running |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes!
…________________________________
From: Peku995 ***@***.***>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2023 7:43 AM
To: cdslaborg/paramonte ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [cdslaborg/paramonte] Intel runtime library (Discussion #23)
Using the matlab parallel toolbox sounds great!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#23 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGMNVXWS2HQUXWGZW75URWTXMU3KRANCNFSM6AAAAAAZQICKZI>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I tried to install the runtime libray automatically via paramonte in Matlab, however, it does not work because somehow it seems as if it would use a wrong path. I also tried to install the library via downloading and installation, which worked, but paramonte does not detect the installation.
What can I do to overcome this problem?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions