-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QGB state machine remove invalid validator set check #646
Merged
rach-id
merged 4 commits into
celestiaorg:qgb-integration
from
rach-id:remove_invalid_validator_check_from_state_machine
Aug 23, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[question][non-blocking] do any checks need to be removed from https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/qgb-integration/docs/architecture/ADR-002-QGB-ValSet.md?plain=1#L158 ? I don't see these checks in that ADR section so maybe not but the contents of the ADR don't match 1:1 with the
ValsetConfirm
implementation here so wanted to confirm.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the ADRs are pretty oooold now. We will need to update them once we have a stable QGB 1.0. The reason we stopped updating them, is we were trying a lot of approaches, and we changed the design multiple times. Thus, it was too much work to keep updating them always.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. If the ADR is no longer accurate then perhaps we can include a disclaimer at the top stating that it's unmaintained and create a GH issue to update it once we have a stable QGB 1.0? Defer to you on how best to track / update it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. We have few issues concerning this:
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/issues/217
#501
#270