chore(nodebuilder/share): Make module construction more digestable

[renaynay]

I tried to clean up the share module construction a bit so that it's easier to parse. Hopefully this is more helpful than the mess that was there prior.

Also please carefully review this PR!! I tried my best to make sure that all components are added where they are supposed to be but it's possible I may have missed something (although all related units are passing).

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 99 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (01585ba) 0.00% compared to head (9d3e286) 51.81%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
nodebuilder/share/module.go	0.00%	98 Missing ⚠️
nodebuilder/share/constructors.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main    #3170       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   51.81%   +51.81%     
=========================================
  Files         0      178      +178     
  Lines         0    11312    +11312     
=========================================
+ Hits          0     5861     +5861     
- Misses        0     4949     +4949     
- Partials      0      502      +502     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Wondertan]

Looks much cleaner! I guess this was coming out work from networking part of pruning. I feel like it may also help(or the opposite) for the shwap integration. Will carefully review once I am back

[Wondertan]

I reviewed it carefully and couldn't find anything suspicious. We had to run the node with these changes to be very sure.

There are still a bunch of things to do to make module construction really clean, but I believe this a good step towards that

[walldiss]

I looked carefully into it and wasn't able to spot any issues. It looks much cleaner now. Thank you for this!