-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: rejects invalid empty range proofs #180
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #180 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.04% 94.09% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 5 5
Lines 537 542 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 505 510 +5
Misses 18 18
Partials 14 14
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 👍 LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
proof.go
Outdated
// IsOfEmptyProof checks whether the proof corresponds to an empty proof as defined in NMT specifications https://github.com/celestiaorg/nmt/blob/master/docs/spec/nmt.md. | ||
func (proof Proof) IsOfEmptyProof() bool { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// IsOfEmptyProof checks whether the proof corresponds to an empty proof as defined in NMT specifications https://github.com/celestiaorg/nmt/blob/master/docs/spec/nmt.md. | |
func (proof Proof) IsOfEmptyProof() bool { | |
// IsEmptyProof checks whether the proof corresponds to an empty proof as defined in NMT specifications https://github.com/celestiaorg/nmt/blob/master/docs/spec/nmt.md. | |
func (proof Proof) IsEmptyProof() bool { |
nit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your suggestion. The reason behind this naming is to maintain consistency with the IsOfAbsence() function, that implements a similar logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see your point, renamed it in 9e3d8de
Overview
Resolves #164
Checklist