Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: fix mdl configuration #3447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

ci: fix mdl configuration #3447

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

Rakshith-R
Copy link
Contributor

@Rakshith-R Rakshith-R commented Oct 18, 2022

This commit makes the following changes:
Please replace \":code_blocks => false\" \
by \":ignore_code_blocks => true\" in your configuration.
Some rules are ignore for the time being,
these will be fixed later on.

Signed-off-by: Rakshith R rar@redhat.com

@Rakshith-R Rakshith-R added ci/skip/e2e skip running e2e CI jobs ci/skip/multi-arch-build skip building on multiple architectures labels Oct 18, 2022
@mergify mergify bot added component/testing Additional test cases or CI work bug Something isn't working labels Oct 18, 2022
@Rakshith-R
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rakshith-R commented Oct 18, 2022

Created #3448 issue to track fixes required.
This will unblock ci for the time being.

This commit makes the following changes:
`Please replace \":code_blocks => false\" \`
`by \":ignore_code_blocks => true\" in your configuration.`
Some rules are ignore for the time being,
these will be fixed later on.

Signed-off-by: Rakshith R <rar@redhat.com>
@Rakshith-R
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio refresh

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 18, 2022

refresh

✅ Pull request refreshed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working ci/skip/e2e skip running e2e CI jobs ci/skip/multi-arch-build skip building on multiple architectures component/testing Additional test cases or CI work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants