-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SPDK CPU auto detect code has issues #866
Comments
baum
pushed a commit
to baum/ceph-nvmeof
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2024
- ceph#866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
baum
pushed a commit
to baum/ceph-nvmeof
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2024
- ceph#866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
baum
pushed a commit
to baum/ceph-nvmeof
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2024
- ceph#866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
baum
pushed a commit
to baum/ceph-nvmeof
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2024
- ceph#866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
baum
pushed a commit
to baum/ceph-nvmeof
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2024
- ceph#866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
baum
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2024
- #866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
barakda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 16, 2024
- #866 Signed-off-by: Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We have come code in the gateway yo check if the user didn't supply a "--cpumask" or "-m" parameters to SPDK. In this is the case the gateway adds such a parameter using a bit mask based on the number of cores in the machine, but no more than 4. There is a problem with this code:
The code checks for "--cpumask" and "-m" in the SPDK command line list, but the actual values there are slightly different. For example, we might have there "--cpumask=0xF" which is not identical to "--cpumask". The result being that even if the user supplied a CPU mask in the configuration, the gateway still adds a second mask to the command line.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: