feat: Use OCP 3.11 specific operator deployment #1183
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tolusha
requested review from
AndrienkoAleksandr,
flacatus,
l0rd and
mmorhun
as code owners
63 tasks
Signed-off-by: Anatolii Bazko <abazko@redhat.com>
tolusha
force-pushed
the
ab/useocp311deployment
branch
from
2ebba46 to
ce849d5
Compare
mmorhun
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2021
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mmorhun, tolusha The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
tolusha
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Anatolii Bazko abazko@redhat.com
What does this PR do?
OCP 3.11 is supposed to use a different operator deployment (without DWCO specific things)
So, for OCP 3.11 we will keep the only one container names as
che-operatorand remove others.Screenshot/screencast of this PR
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CRW-1720
PR Checklist
As the author of this Pull Request I made sure that:
What issues does this PR fix or referenceandHow to test this PRcompletedReviewers
Reviewers, please comment how you tested the PR when approving it.