Avoid breaking of chef package resource on fedora #709
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Artem Sidorenko <artem@posteo.de>
artem-sidorenko
force-pushed
the
fedora-yum
branch
from
37d41af
to
9ac74b5
Compare
artem-sidorenko
changed the title
|
This seems totally reasonable and lgtm! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If you use chef with test-kitchen on bento fedora boxes and invoke the resource
package, it will fail because of missingyum(there is nodnfprovider yet, chef/chef#3201).This PR is a workaround for the time till chef gets the
dnfprovider.See chef/chef#5492 for details and logs