Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixup end_range typos #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2013
Merged

fixup end_range typos #30

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2013

Conversation

mattgleeson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there. I found what I thought might be a couple of typos when CZ tries to parse some of my chef searches.

The braces look like they are facing the wrong way for "normal" range queries, and then when it tried to throw the error there was a missing "expected_end_range" variable. I think this is what was intended.

jkeiser added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2013
@jkeiser jkeiser merged commit 25ed925 into chef:master Jul 19, 2013
@jkeiser
Copy link
Contributor

jkeiser commented Jul 19, 2013

The patch looks good!

Just so I'm clear, is there a bug here beyond the error message? i.e. did you type a valid search but it choked anyway?

@mattgleeson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Right the valid searches were failing to parse because the end was looking
for [ instead of ].
On Jul 18, 2013 7:46 PM, "John Keiser" notifications@github.com wrote:

The patch looks good!

Just so I'm clear, is there a bug here beyond the error message? i.e. did
you type a valid search but it choked anyway?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/30#issuecomment-21228482
.

@jkeiser
Copy link
Contributor

jkeiser commented Jul 19, 2013

Yoink! I totally missed that bit of the line. Good catch, and still correct patch. Thanks!

@chef chef locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 16, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants