Fix SyncReadMem.read; add test #796
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SyncReadMem.read with an enable signal currently only works in compatibility mode, where Wires are implicitly initialized to DontCare. Fix by explicitly assigning DontCare to the Wire. This might fix #775.
jackkoenig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
* Give better error when mport references non-existent memory * Closes #796
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SyncReadMem.read with an enable signal currently only works in compatibility mode, where Wires are implicitly initialized to DontCare. Fix by explicitly assigning DontCare to the Wire.
Related issue: #775
Type of change: bug report
Impact: no functional change
Development Phase: implementation
Release Notes
Fixed
SyncReadMem.readFirrtl error when explicit enable signal is used.