feat(ui, server): Generic SSO OAuth2 OpenID Connect

[DelaunayAlex]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 75 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.09%. Comparing base (42bc2bc) to head (5a38e60).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...sting/security/infra/sso/OAuth2SsoUserService.java	0.00%	18 Missing ⚠️
...ity/infra/sso/OAuth2TokenAuthenticationFilter.java	0.00%	17 Missing ⚠️
...tneytesting/security/ChutneyWebSecurityConfig.java	25.00%	14 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...y/infra/sso/OAuth2TokenAuthenticationProvider.java	0.00%	13 Missing ⚠️
.../security/infra/sso/OAuth2AuthenticationToken.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...eytesting/security/api/SsoOpenIdConnectMapper.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...esting/security/api/SsoOpenIdConnectConfigDto.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...sting/security/api/SsoOpenIdConnectController.java	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #188      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     61.19%   61.09%   -0.10%     
- Complexity     3408     3420      +12     
============================================
  Files           668      675       +7     
  Lines         18445    18578     +133     
  Branches       1008     1016       +8     
============================================
+ Hits          11287    11350      +63     
- Misses         6745     6820      +75     
+ Partials        413      408       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[boddissattva]

My view on this :

• I want to have a working app even if the sso provider is not here. For the moment, backend does not start (but you only have to comment the issuer-id) and the frontend has error too (maybe include the sso controller in the sso profile and catch an error in client in order to deactivate the sso service).
• The sso test package should be in local-dev test directory i think.
• Is it possible to have the profile sso to be additive ? i.e. to be more like ldap or other, just add some independant configuration with no consequence on the existing conf (i talk here about the web security filter chain).
• I don't understand why some sso classes are in the domain ?

I'll add some associated comments directly on the files.