Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.2 #358

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2018
Merged

v0.2 #358

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2018

Conversation

duglin
Copy link
Collaborator

@duglin duglin commented Nov 30, 2018

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis dug@us.ibm.com

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Nov 30, 2018

The href check failures are ok and will be fixed once this is merged.

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Nov 30, 2018

If the vote passes, here's the list of major changes for v0.2 that I was going to include in the release notes - please let me know if you think I'm missing something:

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Dec 4, 2018

IBM votes yes on v0.2
IBM LGTMs this PR (just to show the pattern, I can't technically vote for my own PR :-) )

@rperelma
Copy link
Contributor

rperelma commented Dec 4, 2018

Adobe votes yes on v0.2

Copy link
Contributor

@cneijenhuis cneijenhuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

commercetools votes yes on v0.2

roadmap.md Outdated
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ item; they don't imply an order for implementation._
1. Events are sent by code written by Developer1 and received by code
written by Developer2, where Developer1 has no knowledge of Developer2.

*0.2*
*0.2* - Completed - 2018/12/05
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
*0.2* - Completed - 2018/12/05
*0.2* - Completed - 2018/12/06

Super-minor, but I think the vote officially closes tomorrow? 😉

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clearly calendaring isn't my thing :-) will fix, thanks

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
@Vlaaaaaaad
Copy link

I'm voting yes on v0.2.

I'd really like to see #356 merged before we cut 0.2 so we can highlight the SDK effort and evolution even more.

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Dec 6, 2018

Technically the vote for v0.2 does not include that PR. However, since the PR doesn't impact any of our normative docs and is strictly additive, if the group wants to include it as part of the release I think we can do so. I'll try to remember to bring up this option on today's call.

@deissnerk
Copy link
Contributor

SAP votes yes for v0.2

@clemensv
Copy link
Contributor

clemensv commented Dec 6, 2018

Microsoft is yes for 0.2

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Dec 6, 2018

Vote passed with 12 yes votes and 0 no votes.
We also agreed to merge #356 before we cut the release.

The yes votes were from:
Adobe, commercetools, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Nats/Synadia, Nordstrom, Oracle, Red Hat, SAP, VMWre, Vlad Ionescu

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Dec 6, 2018

Approved on the 12/6 call !!!

@duglin duglin merged commit 5a7c1cf into cloudevents:master Dec 6, 2018
@duglin duglin deleted the v0.2 branch January 13, 2019 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants