[wrangler] R2 jurisdictions support

[bthwaites]

Fixes # R2-1740

What this PR solves / how to test:
This PR adds two things:

1. Allow wrangler r2 commands to specify the jurisdiction where the bucket resides
2. Allow publishing a worker with a binding to an R2 bucket in a jurisdiction

Associated docs issue(s)/PR(s):
None

Author has included the following, where applicable:

• [y] Tests
• [y] Changeset (Changeset guidelines)

Reviewer is to perform the following, as applicable:

• Checked for inclusion of relevant tests
• Checked for inclusion of a relevant changeset
• Checked for creation of associated docs updates
• Manually pulled down the changes and spot-tested

Note for PR author:

We want to celebrate and highlight awesome PR review! If you think this PR received a particularly high-caliber review, please assign it the label highlight pr review so future reviewers can take inspiration and learn from it.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 7a158ce

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
wrangler	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

A wrangler prerelease is available for testing. You can install this latest build in your project with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/6164470821/npm-package-wrangler-3775

You can reference the automatically updated head of this PR with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/prs/6164470821/npm-package-wrangler-3775

Or you can use npx with this latest build directly:

npx https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/6164470821/npm-package-wrangler-3775 dev path/to/script.js

Additional artifacts:

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/6164470821/npm-package-cloudflare-pages-shared-3775

Note that these links will no longer work once the GitHub Actions artifact expires.

---

wrangler@3.7.0 includes the following runtime dependencies:

Package	Constraint	Resolved
miniflare	3.20230904.0	3.20230904.0
workerd	1.20230904.0	1.20230904.0
workerd --version	1.20230904.0	2023-09-04

|

Please ensure constraints are pinned, and miniflare/workerd minor versions match.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3775 (7a158ce) into main (a986f19) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 80.64%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3775      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.10%   75.12%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         195      195              
  Lines       11487    11526      +39     
  Branches     3036     3049      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         8627     8659      +32     
- Misses       2860     2867       +7     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
packages/wrangler/src/dev.tsx	83.19% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/wrangler/src/init.ts	92.69% <ø> (ø)
packages/wrangler/src/config/validation.ts	89.98% <33.33%> (-0.22%)	⬇️
packages/wrangler/src/r2/helpers.ts	90.00% <70.58%> (-7.68%)	⬇️
packages/wrangler/src/r2/index.ts	86.01% <88.88%> (-1.29%)	⬇️
packages/wrangler/src/config/index.ts	90.44% <100.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...src/deployment-bundle/create-worker-upload-form.ts	88.23% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/wrangler/src/user/user.ts	72.23% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[mrbbot]

Hey! 👋 This looks good to me, though I'm not sure what's up with the Windows tests. 😕 I'll try re-run them, but have you got a Windows laptop to try run them locally?

[penalosa]

Looks good to me! One small nit, but that's it

[penalosa]

We don't generally use capitalised flags in Wrangler. For consistency, would it be possible to use -j?

[bthwaites]

-j seems to be in use already for --experimental-json-config. Would it be better to use -n?

[penalosa]

Could you rebase on main, and then we can get this in?

[bthwaites]

The windows tests seem to have failed again after rebase. I don't have a windows machine to test on, but last time this happened it resolved after running again.