Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v8] Fix pr issues #2973

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

joaopapereira
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the Change

Fix github action failing while testing PRs. We found out that when we were using workflow_run, we were always retrieving the workflow files from the main branch. The main change that is made here is to stop relying on workflow_run and to call the integration tests after the unit tests are successful.

Signed-off-by: João Pereira <joaod@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: João Pereira <joaod@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: João Pereira <joaod@vmware.com>
Starting on version 1.181.0, capi will no longer report the version of
the nginx server to ensure that no information is leaked.
For more information check cloudfoundry/capi-release#406

Signed-off-by: João Pereira <joaod@vmware.com>
Starting on version 76.26.0 of UAA a change was made that changes the
behavior more context in cloudfoundry/uaa#2545

Signed-off-by: João Pereira <joaod@vmware.com>
Copy link
Member

@gururajsh gururajsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gururajsh gururajsh merged commit 56666f0 into cloudfoundry:v8 Jun 20, 2024
11 of 14 checks passed
@@ -40,17 +36,6 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ${{ inputs.os }}
container: us-west2-docker.pkg.dev/shepherd-268822/shepherd2/concourse-resource:latest
steps:
- uses: LouisBrunner/checks-action@v2.0.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joaopapereira, does the removal of this step mean that the integration tests run will no longer be reflected in the check?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that the tests are now part of the unit tests workflow, there is no need to add extra check tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants