Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove maintenance build #646

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Remove maintenance build #646

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

domdom82
Copy link
Contributor

@domdom82 domdom82 commented Apr 4, 2024

Maintenance pipeline already removed from concourse.

Maintenance branch to be removed after this PR is merged.

@domdom82 domdom82 requested a review from CFN-CI as a code owner April 4, 2024 13:33
@domdom82 domdom82 requested a review from a team April 4, 2024 13:33
@domdom82 domdom82 added the run-ci Allow this PR to be tested on Concourse label Apr 4, 2024
@domdom82 domdom82 enabled auto-merge (rebase) April 4, 2024 13:38
@peanball
Copy link
Contributor

peanball commented Apr 5, 2024

Could you add a pointer in the docs (e.g. readme) that we had a maintenance branch, that it is disabled and in which commit to find the alternative pipeline?

@domdom82
Copy link
Contributor Author

domdom82 commented Apr 5, 2024

Could you add a pointer in the docs (e.g. readme) that we had a maintenance branch, that it is disabled and in which commit to find the alternative pipeline?

Well, the commit is this PR, right? All we have to do is revert it and we got the pipeline back. I'll add it to the readme though.

@domdom82 domdom82 disabled auto-merge April 5, 2024 11:06
@domdom82 domdom82 merged commit 0c2b3ec into master Apr 5, 2024
4 checks passed
@domdom82 domdom82 deleted the remove-maintenance-build branch April 5, 2024 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
run-ci Allow this PR to be tested on Concourse
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants