WIP: Document helmfile, template imports #741
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include formatting updates to the GitHub Actions workflow file, the addition of a demo folder in the mock job, and modifications to several Atmos configuration files. Specifically, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range comments (6)
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor.mdx (1)
Line range hint
15-28: Comprehensive use cases enhance understandingThe expanded use cases section provides excellent context for when and why to use vendoring. This addition significantly improves the document's value to readers.
Consider adding a brief introductory sentence before the bullet points to improve the flow:
## Use-cases +Atmos vendoring addresses several common challenges in enterprise software development and DevOps: - **Sharing Components Across an Enterprise**: Utilize Atmos vendoring to access a centralized component library....github/workflows/test.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-358: Consider clarifying excluded demo foldersThe workflow file is well-structured and covers various testing scenarios. However, there are several commented-out demo folders in the
mockandlintjobs (e.g.,demo-component-manifest,demo-custom-command, etc.). It would be helpful to clarify why these folders are excluded from testing, either through comments in the file or in the PR description. This will help maintainers understand the current testing coverage and any limitations.website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (1)
Line range hint
65-139: LGTM: Improved specificity with Terraform Attributes sectionThe change from "Component Attributes" to "Terraform Attributes" enhances the document's structure and makes it clear that these attributes are specific to Terraform components. This aligns well with the new structure of the document.
Consider adding a brief introductory sentence before the attribute list to provide context, such as:
"The following attributes are specific to Terraform components and can be used in their configuration:"website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/stacks.mdx (3)
Line range hint
40-52: Great addition of Use-cases section!The new Use-cases section effectively illustrates practical applications of Atmos Stacks. The three examples (Rapid Environment Provisioning, Multi-Tenant Infrastructure Management, and Compliance and Governance) provide valuable context for readers to understand how stacks can be utilized in real-world scenarios.
Consider adding a brief introductory sentence before listing the use cases to provide a smoother transition from the previous section.
Line range hint
54-114: Excellent reorganization and expansion of the Conventions section!The restructured Conventions section greatly improves the clarity of key concepts in Atmos Stacks. The new definitions and explanations for Stack Names, Components vs Component instances, Parent Stacks vs Child Stacks, and Logical Stacks vs Physical Stack Manifests provide valuable insights into the Atmos stack ecosystem. The detailed description of physical stack file processing is particularly helpful.
Consider adding a brief example or diagram to illustrate the relationship between Logical Stacks and Physical Stack Manifests, as this concept might be challenging for some readers to grasp immediately.
Line range hint
116-177: Great improvements to the Schema section!The updated Schema section provides a clearer and more comprehensive explanation of the stack file structure. The addition of a YAML example effectively illustrates how to configure components and variables, which is particularly helpful for readers. The enhanced explanation of the
componentsattribute adds valuable context.Consider adding brief explanations for the other top-level attributes in the YAML example (e.g.,
import,vars,terraform,helmfile) to provide a complete overview of the stack file structure.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)
- examples/demo-helmfile/atmos.yaml (2 hunks)
- examples/demo-vendoring/atmos.yaml (2 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/deploy/deploy.mdx (0 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (4 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/stacks.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/quick-start/install-atmos.mdx (6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- website/docs/core-concepts/deploy/deploy.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
examples/demo-helmfile/atmos.yaml
[warning] 36-36: missing starting space in comment
(comments)
[warning] 37-37: missing starting space in comment
(comments)
examples/demo-vendoring/atmos.yaml
[error] 27-27: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[error] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
🪛 LanguageTool
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx
[uncategorized] ~431-~431: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...f a component wihtout losing the state. By default theworkspace_key_prefixincorporates...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor.mdx (3)
Line range hint
1-13: Improved introduction and contextThe updated introduction provides a clearer explanation of vendoring in Atmos and its benefits, particularly for managing dependencies in tools like Terraform. This change enhances the reader's understanding from the outset.
48-52: Valuable GitOps integration tipThe addition of the GitOps integration tip is excellent. It provides practical advice on how to automate and streamline the vendoring process using GitHub Actions, which can significantly improve workflow efficiency and change management.
Line range hint
30-45: Clear explanation of vendoring types with room for improvementThe introduction of the two types of vendoring (Vendor Manifest and Component Manifest) is a valuable addition to the documentation. It helps users understand the different approaches available in Atmos.
However, the explanation of the Component Manifest seems incomplete. Consider expanding on this to provide more details about its usage and benefits, similar to the explanation given for the Vendor Manifest.
To ensure consistency and completeness of the documentation, please run the following script:
.github/workflows/test.yml (3)
13-16: LGTM: Consistent formatting inpaths-ignoreThe change to use double quotes for the
paths-ignorepaths is a good practice for YAML files and improves consistency.
97-118: Improved Docker linting configuration and security analysisThe changes in the
dockerjob are beneficial:
- Improved formatting and indentation enhance readability.
- The
hadolintaction is now properly configured with specific options, including ignoring the DL3008 rule.- The addition of the SARIF file upload step enables better integration with GitHub's code scanning features.
These changes will improve the workflow's effectiveness in catching Docker-related issues and security vulnerabilities.
257-257: LGTM: Addition ofdemo-vendoringto test matrixThe inclusion of
demo-vendoringin the test matrix aligns well with the PR objectives. This change ensures that the new vendoring-related configurations and examples will be tested as part of the CI process, improving overall code quality and documentation accuracy.website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (3)
26-32: LGTM: Improved clarity in Component Schema sectionThe changes in this section enhance the clarity of the documentation by providing more specific information about component configuration and its relationship to YAML stack config files. These improvements will help users better understand the concept of components in Atmos.
Line range hint
31-65: LGTM: Improved structure with Terraform Schema sectionThe addition of the "Terraform Schema" heading and the minor wording change enhance the document's structure and readability. The YAML example remains consistent, which is good for maintaining clarity for users familiar with the previous version.
218-228: LGTM: Enhanced explanation of component typesThe changes in the Types of Components section provide more detailed and clearer explanations of real and abstract components. The added analogies to programming concepts (concrete classes and abstract base classes) help users better understand the differences between these component types in Atmos.
website/docs/quick-start/install-atmos.mdx (6)
14-14: LGTM: CodeBlock import added for improved code formatting.The addition of the CodeBlock import enhances the document's ability to display code snippets with proper formatting, which aligns well with the documentation improvements.
Line range hint
101-115: LGTM: Improved NixOS installation instructions.The added instructions for NixOS users are clear and helpful. They provide guidance on accessing the latest version of Atmos by updating the Nix configuration to include unstable packages. This addition ensures NixOS users can stay up-to-date with the latest Atmos features.
131-133: LGTM: New section for alternative installation methods.The addition of the "Other Ways to Install" section improves the document's organization by grouping less common installation methods. This makes it easier for users to find the installation method that best suits their needs.
147-147: LGTM: Improved Go installation instructions with CodeBlock.The use of CodeBlock for the Go installation command enhances readability and makes it easier for users to copy the correct command. The inclusion of the
<LatestRelease />placeholder ensures users install the most recent version of Atmos.
175-176: LGTM: Improved asdf and mise installation instructions with CodeBlock.The use of CodeBlock for both asdf and mise installation commands enhances readability and consistency across different installation methods. The inclusion of the
<LatestRelease />placeholder ensures users install the most recent version of Atmos. These changes make it easier for users to copy and use the correct installation commands.Also applies to: 195-195
Line range hint
1-368: LGTM: Overall improvements to the Atmos installation documentation.The changes to this document significantly enhance the installation instructions for Atmos. Key improvements include:
- Better code formatting with the introduction of the CodeBlock component.
- More detailed instructions for NixOS users.
- A new section grouping alternative installation methods.
- Consistent use of CodeBlock for installation commands across different methods.
- Inclusion of placeholders for the latest release version in installation commands.
These updates align well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation related to Atmos. The improved structure and consistency make it easier for users to find and follow the appropriate installation method for their needs.
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/stacks.mdx (2)
Line range hint
1-38: Excellent improvements to the introduction and overview!The refined introduction and additional paragraphs significantly enhance the explanation of Atmos Stacks. The emphasis on stacks as architectural blueprints and the clarification of their role in connecting components provide a clearer understanding for readers. The highlighted benefits of using stacks, such as achieving DRY architectures and deploying vanilla Terraform modules without code generation, effectively communicate the value of this approach.
Line range hint
179-214: Valuable addition of the Stack Files section!The new Stack Files section provides important guidance on organizing stack files, which is crucial for managing large-scale environments. The recommendations for basic and hierarchical layouts offer practical approaches for different scales of infrastructure.
The explanation appears to be cut off at the end. Please ensure that the complete content is included in the final version of the document. Can you verify if there's any missing content after the line "```"?
aknysh
added
the
no-release
osterman
changed the title
osterman
force-pushed
the
document-helmfile
branch
from
0daa709 to
7fc899f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range comments (6)
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor.mdx (3)
Line range hint
16-25: Standardize bullet point formatting in use cases section.For better readability and consistency:
- Ensure each bullet point ends with a period
- Remove mid-sentence line breaks
- **Sharing Components Across an Enterprise**: Utilize Atmos vendoring to access a centralized component library, promoting code reuse and - efficiency across teams (or business units) while enabling customization and independent version control post-vendoring. This approach enhances collaboration without sacrificing the flexibility for teams to tailor components to their specific needs or update them at their preferred pace. + **Sharing Components Across an Enterprise**: Utilize Atmos vendoring to access a centralized component library, promoting code reuse and efficiency across teams (or business units) while enabling customization and independent version control post-vendoring. This approach enhances collaboration without sacrificing the flexibility for teams to tailor components to their specific needs or update them at their preferred pace.
Line range hint
42-45: Remove redundant self-reference in tip.The tip refers to the current page (
Atmos Vendoring), which creates a circular reference.-:::tip -Refer to [`Atmos Vendoring`](/core-concepts/vendor) for more details -:::
Line range hint
40-41: Enhance component.yaml description.The description of
component.yamlcould be more detailed. Consider adding:
- Example directory structure
- When to use component.yaml vs vendor.yaml
- Limitations or specific use cases
Would you like me to help draft an expanded section for the component.yaml documentation?
website/docs/quick-start/install-atmos.mdx (1)
Line range hint
101-115: Consider usingnixlanguage identifier for better syntax highlighting.The instructions are clear, but the code block uses
consolelanguage identifier for Nix configuration. Usingnixwould provide better syntax highlighting.- ```console + ```nix nixpkgs.url = "github:nixos/nixpkgs/nixos-unstable"; ```website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/stacks.mdx (2)
Line range hint
19-20: Fix grammatical issue in automation description.The sentence "Then by running the
atmoscommand, automate the orchestrate the deployment" contains redundant words. Consider revising to:
"Then by running theatmoscommand, automate the deployment" or "Then by running theatmoscommand, orchestrate the deployment"
Line range hint
179-200: Complete the hierarchical layout documentation.The hierarchical layout section ends abruptly. Consider completing it with:
- A full example of the recommended folder structure
- Explanation of how to organize stacks across multiple accounts/regions
- Best practices for managing stack dependencies in a hierarchical layout
Would you like me to help draft the complete hierarchical layout documentation section?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)
- examples/demo-helmfile/atmos.yaml (2 hunks)
- examples/demo-vendoring/atmos.yaml (2 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/deploy/deploy.mdx (0 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (4 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/stacks.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/quick-start/install-atmos.mdx (6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- website/docs/core-concepts/deploy/deploy.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
examples/demo-helmfile/atmos.yaml
[warning] 36-36: missing starting space in comment
(comments)
[warning] 37-37: missing starting space in comment
(comments)
examples/demo-vendoring/atmos.yaml
[error] 27-27: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[error] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
🪛 LanguageTool
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx
[uncategorized] ~431-~431: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...f a component wihtout losing the state. By default theworkspace_key_prefixincorporates...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
examples/demo-vendoring/atmos.yaml (2)
10-10: LGTM! Good formatting.The added empty line improves readability by properly separating major configuration sections.
23-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider expanding the test command for helmfile validation.
Given this PR's focus on helmfile documentation and templates, the test command seems incomplete. It only runs
atmos vendor pullwithout actually validating the helmfile configurations or templates.Consider expanding the steps to include helmfile validation:
commands: - name: "test" - description: "Run all tests" + description: "Validate vendored components and helmfile configurations" steps: - atmos vendor pull + - helmfile lint + - helmfile validateLet's verify if helmfile is used in the repository:
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 27-27: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[error] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
.github/workflows/test.yml (3)
13-16: LGTM: Consistent quote formatting in paths-ignore.The formatting changes to use double quotes are consistent with GitHub Actions best practices.
257-257: LGTM: Added demo-vendoring to test matrix.The addition of demo-vendoring to the test matrix aligns with the PR objectives for documenting and testing vendoring functionality.
97-119: Well-configured Dockerfile linting with Hadolint.Good addition of Dockerfile linting with proper configuration:
- SARIF output for GitHub code scanning integration
- Appropriate ignore rule for DL3008 with documented reasoning
- Failure threshold set to catch warnings
Let's verify the Dockerfile exists and contains apt-get commands that justify the DL3008 ignore:
✅ Verification successful
DL3008 ignore rule is justified for apt-get installations
The verification confirms that the Dockerfile contains multiple apt-get install commands without pinned versions, making the DL3008 ignore rule appropriate. The installations include:
- curl, git, ca-certificates
- terraform, kubectl, helmfile, helm
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if Dockerfile exists and contains apt-get commands if [ -f "Dockerfile" ]; then echo "Dockerfile contents:" grep -A 3 "apt-get" Dockerfile else echo "Dockerfile not found" fiLength of output: 669
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (2)
26-26: LGTM: Improved clarity of Component Configuration definitionThe updated description is more precise and consistent with the documentation's terminology.
218-228: LGTM: Enhanced explanation of component typesThe addition of programming analogies (concrete classes and abstract base classes) makes the concepts more relatable and easier to understand.
website/docs/quick-start/install-atmos.mdx (1)
14-14: LGTM! Good improvement to code block formatting.The addition of the CodeBlock component enhances code snippet presentation and maintains consistency throughout the documentation.
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/stacks.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-200: Documentation improvements look great!The revisions have significantly enhanced the documentation's clarity and structure. The additions of use cases, clear definitions, and practical examples make it much more user-friendly. While there are a few minor areas for improvement noted above, the overall changes are a substantial improvement.
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx (1)
453-453: LGTM: Clear and comprehensive OCI registry documentationThe section provides clear instructions for vendoring from OCI registries, with good examples and proper template usage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/imports.mdx (2)
Line range hint
63-88: Consider improving the formatting of the important noteThe content is excellent, but the readability could be enhanced by:
- Using bullet points for the three key points in the important note
- Adding whitespace between the points
Consider this format:
:::important - The imported files must have the `.yaml.tmpl` extension to be processed as Go templates and to be able to use the `context` variables. - Additionally, the `skip_templates_processing` flag can be used to skip template processing for the imported file. - Templating must be enabled in [`atmos.yaml`](/core-concepts/stacks/templates) for Atmos to process the imported files as Go templates. + • The imported files must have the `.yaml.tmpl` extension to be processed as Go templates and to be able to use the `context` variables. + + • The `skip_templates_processing` flag can be used to skip template processing for the imported file. + + • Templating must be enabled in [`atmos.yaml`](/core-concepts/stacks/templates) for Atmos to process the imported files as Go templates. :::
Line range hint
281-331: Consider adding a visual representationThe explanation of hierarchical context processing is thorough, but a visual diagram showing the flow of context merging would make it easier to understand.
Consider adding a Mermaid diagram to illustrate:
- The order of import processing
- How contexts are merged at each level
- The precedence rules in action
This would help users better understand the hierarchical nature of the imports and context merging.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~280-~280: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...emplate into a top-level stack multiple times providing different context variables t...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- website/docs/core-concepts/projects/configuration/helmfile.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (4 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/imports.mdx (11 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
website/docs/core-concepts/projects/configuration/helmfile.mdx
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ides many settings that are specific to Helmfile which are configured inatmos.yaml. ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~19-~19: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...inatmos.yaml. ## CLI Configuration All of the following settings are defined by defau...(ALL_OF_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
website/docs/core-concepts/projects/configuration/helmfile.mdx (1)
11-11: Verify the broad compatibility claimThe statement about compatibility with "every version of helmfile" needs verification. We should specify the tested versions or minimum supported version.
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (4)
26-30: LGTM: Clear component configuration definitionThe added clarification about component configuration being defined in YAML stack config files improves documentation clarity.
31-32: LGTM: Appropriate section renamingRenaming to "Terraform Schema" provides better clarity and distinguishes it from the newly added Helmfile schema section.
141-169: LGTM: Well-structured Helmfile schema sectionThe addition of a dedicated Helmfile schema section improves the documentation structure.
203-213: LGTM: Excellent component type explanationsThe enhanced explanations with programming analogies (concrete classes and abstract base classes) make the concepts more relatable and easier to understand.
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/imports.mdx (4)
17-22: Well-structured use cases section!The addition of clear use cases helps users understand when and why to use imports. The examples of DRY Configuration, Configuration Blueprints, and Service Catalogs provide practical context.
23-25: Clear and actionable warning message!The warning effectively communicates the potential pitfalls of overusing imports while providing a helpful link to best practices for guidance.
149-151: Consistent file extension usage!The update to use
.yaml.tmplextension aligns with the template processing requirements documented earlier in the file.
248-250: Consistent template file naming!The example correctly uses the
.yaml.tmplextension, maintaining consistency throughout the documentation.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- website/docs/core-concepts/projects/configuration/helmfile.mdx (1 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (4 hunks)
- website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
website/docs/core-concepts/projects/configuration/helmfile.mdx
[style] ~23-~23: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...in atmos.yaml. ## CLI Configuration All of the following settings are defined by defau...
(ALL_OF_THE)
website/docs/core-concepts/vendor/vendor-manifest.mdx
[uncategorized] ~431-~431: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...f a component wihtout losing the state. By default the workspace_key_prefix incorporates...
(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
website/docs/core-concepts/projects/configuration/helmfile.mdx (2)
44-45: Enhance EKS configuration documentation
Given the ongoing discussion about EKS requirements, consider:
- Clarifying the exact implications of enabling
use_eks - Documenting any prerequisites for EKS integration
- Adding troubleshooting tips for common EKS setup issues
10-12: Verify the version compatibility claim
The statement "compatible with every version of helmfile" is quite broad. Consider:
- Specifying the actual tested version range
- Adding any known version-specific limitations or considerations
website/docs/core-concepts/stacks/define-components.mdx (4)
26-30: LGTM: Clear component configuration explanation
The added clarification about component configuration in YAML stack files is accurate and helpful for users.
Line range hint 31-65: LGTM: Well-structured Terraform schema documentation
The section has been appropriately renamed and the example clearly demonstrates Terraform-specific configuration.
180-182: Update namespace documentation for Helmfile context
The namespace documentation still references terraform-null-label, which isn't relevant for Helmfile components.
203-213: LGTM: Excellent explanation of component types
The enhanced explanation with programming analogies (concrete classes and abstract base classes) makes the concepts more relatable and easier to understand.
|
These changes were released in v1.96.0. |
what
helmfilewhy
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
helmfileconfiguration to include a new propertyuse_eks.Documentation
Bug Fixes