Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add bundle.json file to invocation image #196

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2019
Merged

Add bundle.json file to invocation image #196

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2019

Conversation

youreddy
Copy link

/cc @glyn @radu-matei

Copy link
Contributor

@glyn glyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there is one mistake which needs correcting and I've suggested some image vs container clarifications which I don't feel strongly about.

(Please note this review should be regarded as non-binding since I am not a spec maintainer.)

100-CNAB.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
100-CNAB.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
101-bundle-json.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
103-bundle-runtime.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
100-CNAB.md Outdated
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ The process for standardization is described in an appendix:
## History

- The `bundle.cnab` is now the name of a signed `bundle.json`.
- The `bundle.json` is now a stand-alone artifact, not part of the invocation image.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than rewrite history, I think it would be better to add a new history line. Also, I'm not sure what the deleted line was referring to - perhaps bundle.json used to be literally part of the invocation image?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@glyn not sure if my added line made it less confusing. Let me know your thoughts or suggestions.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The line was fine, but in the wrong place. ;-)

@glyn glyn added this to the CNAB Core 1.0.0 milestone Jun 13, 2019
@youreddy youreddy closed this Jun 13, 2019
@jeremyrickard
Copy link
Member

@youreddy did you intend to close this?

@youreddy
Copy link
Author

@jeremyrickard, I think I did by accident. And lost my commits along the way! Will recover and reopen the pr later today.

@youreddy youreddy reopened this Jun 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@glyn glyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM except the history is out of order - please see my suggestion.

100-CNAB.md Show resolved Hide resolved
100-CNAB.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Urvashi Reddy and others added 2 commits June 17, 2019 18:16
Co-Authored-By: Glyn Normington <gnormington@pivotal.io>
Co-Authored-By: Glyn Normington <gnormington@pivotal.io>
@youreddy
Copy link
Author

Added all @glyn's suggestions above. Ready for review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants