Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

catalog: utilize scans for a large number of descriptors #101937

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2023

Conversation

fqazi
Copy link
Collaborator

@fqazi fqazi commented Apr 20, 2023

Previously, the catalog descriptor would fetch descriptors via point lookups using Get when scanning large batches of descriptors. This was further extended to also look up ZoneConfigs and comments in a similar way. Recently, we we started seeing regression on the Django test suite involving the pg_catalog tables, which tend to do read large number of descriptors, likely linked to extra overhead linked to both comments and zone configs in 23.1. To address this, this patch ill now start using scans for runs of descriptor IDs for batch scans which reduces the overall cost of fetching a large number of descriptors hiding this cost.

Fixes: #100871

Release note: None

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@fqazi fqazi added backport-23.1.x Flags PRs that need to be backported to 23.1 backport-23.1.0 labels Apr 20, 2023
Previously, the catalog descriptor would fetch descriptors
via point lookups using Get when scanning large batches
of descriptors. This was further extended to also look up
ZoneConfigs and comments in a similar way. Recently, we
we started seeing regression on the Django test suite involving the
pg_catalog tables, which tend to do read large number of
descriptors, likely linked to extra overhead linked
to both comments and zone configs in 23.1. To address this,
this patch ill now start using scans for runs of descriptor IDs for batch
scans which reduces the overall cost of fetching a large number
of descriptors hiding this cost.

Fixes: cockroachdb#100871

Release note: None
@fqazi fqazi marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2023 19:18
@fqazi fqazi requested review from a team and chengxiong-ruan April 20, 2023 19:18
Copy link
Contributor

@chengxiong-ruan chengxiong-ruan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very nice!

@fqazi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fqazi commented Apr 20, 2023

@chengxiong-ruan TFTR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Apr 20, 2023

This PR was included in a batch that timed out, it will be automatically retried

@craig craig bot merged commit 5ab6451 into cockroachdb:master Apr 20, 2023
@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Apr 20, 2023

Build succeeded:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-23.1.x Flags PRs that need to be backported to 23.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sql: Django introspection query performance regression (still)
3 participants