release-19.1: storage: Don't swallow ErrEpochAlreadyIncremented #36959
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
IncrementEpoch was failing to distinguish between the request that caused the increment and another caller making the same increment. This is incorrect since a successful increment tells you *when* the node was confirmed dead, while relying on another node's increment leaves this uncertain. In rare cases involving a badly overloaded cluster, this could result in inconsistencies (non-serializable transactions) due to incorrect timestamp cache management. Fixes cockroachdb#35986 Release note (bug fix): Fix a rare inconsistency that could occur on badly overloaded clusters.
|
This change is |
nvanbenschoten
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport 1/1 commits from #36942.
/cc @cockroachdb/release
IncrementEpoch was failing to distinguish between the request that
caused the increment and another caller making the same increment.
This is incorrect since a successful increment tells you when the
node was confirmed dead, while relying on another node's increment
leaves this uncertain.
In rare cases involving a badly overloaded cluster, this could result
in inconsistencies (non-serializable transactions) due to incorrect
timestamp cache management.
Fixes #35986
Release note (bug fix): Fix a rare inconsistency that could occur on
badly overloaded clusters.