Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exec: fix a bug with ON expression support for joiners #40651

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2019

Conversation

yuzefovich
Copy link
Member

Previously, a selection vector was ignored when applying a filter
on the batch. Now this is fixed. It is extremely difficult to write
a unit test for this at the moment because the filter planning code
lives in sql/distsqlrun.

Release note: None

Previously, a selection vector was ignored when applying a filter
on the batch. Now this is fixed. It is extremely difficult to write
a unit test for this at the moment because the filter planning code
lives in sql/distsqlrun.

Release note: None
@yuzefovich yuzefovich requested review from jordanlewis and a team September 10, 2019 20:46
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@jordanlewis jordanlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

TFTR!

bors r+

craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
40651: exec: fix a bug with ON expression support for joiners r=yuzefovich a=yuzefovich

Previously, a selection vector was ignored when applying a filter
on the batch. Now this is fixed. It is extremely difficult to write
a unit test for this at the moment because the filter planning code
lives in sql/distsqlrun.

Release note: None

Co-authored-by: Yahor Yuzefovich <yahor@cockroachlabs.com>
@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 10, 2019

Build succeeded

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants