Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sql: remove QueryWithCols method from the internal executor #60604

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2021

Conversation

yuzefovich
Copy link
Member

Previous commit removed this method from the interface, and this commit
follows up to remove the method entirely. This is done in a similar
fashion - by changing to using QueryRowExWithCols (when at most one
row is expected) and to using the iterator API (avoiding the buffering
of rows in all cases).

Addresses: #48595.

Release note: None

Previous commit removed this method from the interface, and this commit
follows up to remove the method entirely. This is done in a similar
fashion - by changing to using `QueryRowExWithCols` (when at most one
row is expected) and to using the iterator API (avoiding the buffering
of rows in all cases).

Release note: None
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

Friends, could one of you take a look at this please? (I accepted all suggestions of the GitHub about reviewers.)

Copy link
Member

@itsbilal itsbilal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @miretskiy and @solongordon)

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member Author

TFTR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Feb 17, 2021

Build failed (retrying...):

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Feb 17, 2021

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 889c27a into cockroachdb:master Feb 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants