Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.2: tree: fix tuple encoding performance regression #98772

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Backport 1/1 commits from #98717 on behalf of @mgartner.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


This commit fixes a performance regression in pgwire encoding of tuples
introduced in #95009.

Informs #98306

Epic: None

Release note: None


Release justification: low risk fix

This commit fixes a performance regression in pgwire encoding of tuples
introduced in #95009.

Informs #98306

Epic: None

Release note: None
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.2-98717 branch from 8699c74 to 653da16 Compare March 16, 2023 14:39
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 16, 2023 14:39
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.2-98717 branch from 66b7da6 to 8e9381e Compare March 16, 2023 14:39
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Mar 16, 2023
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Mar 16, 2023

It looks like your PR touches production code but doesn't add or edit any test code. Did you consider adding tests to your PR?

🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@yuzefovich yuzefovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @mgartner)

@mgartner mgartner merged commit 382162f into release-22.2 Mar 16, 2023
@mgartner mgartner deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.2-98717 branch March 16, 2023 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants