[TS-392] Failed to parse output: Unrecognized token 'No': was expecting 'null', 'true', 'false' or NaN

[ben-manes]

I observe that the analysis fails. It isn't clear if this is a configuration mistake, in which case the error could be more helpful.

Status: Downloaded newer image for codacy/codacy-analysis-cli:7.6.4
05/22 19:04:04 ERROR CodacyPlugins:11 - Failed to parse output: Unrecognized token 'No': was expecting 'null', 'true', 'false' or NaN
 at [Source: (String)"No specified files"; line: 1, column: 3] - No specified files 
com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParseException: Unrecognized token 'No': was expecting 'null', 'true', 'false' or NaN
 at [Source: (String)"No specified files"; line: 1, column: 3]
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser._constructError(JsonParser.java:1804)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.base.ParserMinimalBase._reportError(ParserMinimalBase.java:703)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json.ReaderBasedJsonParser._reportInvalidToken(ReaderBasedJsonParser.java:2853)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json.ReaderBasedJsonParser._reportInvalidToken(ReaderBasedJsonParser.java:2831)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json.ReaderBasedJsonParser._matchToken(ReaderBasedJsonParser.java:2612)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json.ReaderBasedJsonParser._handleOddValue(ReaderBasedJsonParser.java:1876)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json.ReaderBasedJsonParser.nextToken(ReaderBasedJsonParser.java:757)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._initForReading(ObjectMapper.java:4141)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._readValue(ObjectMapper.java:3971)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.readValue(ObjectMapper.java:2[276](https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/actions/runs/5049430617/jobs/9058875700#step:5:288))

- classesDirectories: /src
  sourceDirectories: /src

	at com.codacy.tools.spotbugs.SpotBugs$.apply(SpotBugs.scala:70)
	at com.codacy.tools.scala.seed.DockerEngine.executeTool(DockerEngine.scala:53)
	at com.codacy.tools.scala.seed.DockerEngine.$anonfun$main$2(DockerEngine.scala:35)
	at scala.util.Success.$anonfun$map$1(Try.scala:255)
	at scala.util.Success.map(Try.scala:213)
	at com.codacy.tools.scala.seed.DockerEngine.$anonfun$main$1(DockerEngine.scala:27)
	at scala.util.Success.flatMap(Try.scala:251)
	at com.codacy.tools.scala.seed.DockerEngine.main(DockerEngine.scala:26)
	at com.codacy.tools.spotbugs.Engine.main(Engine.scala)
           
	at com.codacy.plugins.runners.BinaryDockerRunner.$anonfun$run$4(BinaryDockerRunner.scala:84)
	at scala.util.Success.flatMap(Try.scala:251)
	at com.codacy.plugins.runners.BinaryDockerRunner.run(BinaryDockerRunner.scala:69)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.ToolRunner.$anonfun$apply$2(ToolRunner.scala:77)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.CodacyDocker$.$anonfun$usingDockerConfig$2(CodacyDocker.scala:45)
	at com.codacy.plugins.utils.FileHelper$.$anonfun$usingNewFile$2(FileHelper.scala:51)
	at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:213)
	at com.codacy.plugins.utils.FileHelper$.usingNewFile(FileHelper.scala:45)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.CodacyDocker$.usingConfigPath(CodacyDocker.scala:57)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.CodacyDocker$.$anonfun$usingDockerConfig$1(CodacyDocker.scala:39)
	at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:230)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.CodacyDocker$.usingDockerConfig(CodacyDocker.scala:38)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.ToolRunner.$anonfun$apply$1(ToolRunner.scala:76)
	at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:213)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.ToolRunner.apply(ToolRunner.scala:61)
	at com.codacy.plugins.results.traits.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.scala:49)
	at com.codacy.analysis.core.tools.Tool.run(Tool.scala:91)
	at com.codacy.analysis.core.analysis.CodacyPluginsAnalyser.analyse(CodacyPluginsAnalyser.scala:25)
	at com.codacy.analysis.cli.analysis.AnalyseExecutor.$anonfun$issues$1(AnalyseExecutor.scala:150)
	at scala.util.Success.flatMap(Try.scala:251)
	at com.codacy.analysis.cli.analysis.AnalyseExecutor.issues(AnalyseExecutor.scala:142)
	at com.codacy.analysis.cli.analysis.AnalyseExecutor.$anonfun$run$5(AnalyseExecutor.scala:66)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AugmentedIterableIterator.map2combiner(RemainsIterator.scala:116)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AugmentedIterableIterator.map2combiner$(RemainsIterator.scala:113)
	at scala.collection.parallel.immutable.ParHashSet$ParHashSetIterator.map2combiner(ParHashSet.scala:81)
	at scala.collection.parallel.ParIterableLike$Map.leaf(ParIterableLike.scala:1056)
	at scala.collection.parallel.Task.$anonfun$tryLeaf$1(Tasks.scala:53)
	at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
	at scala.util.control.Breaks$$anon$1.catchBreak(Breaks.scala:67)
	at scala.collection.parallel.Task.tryLeaf(Tasks.scala:56)
	at scala.collection.parallel.Task.tryLeaf$(Tasks.scala:50)
	at scala.collection.parallel.ParIterableLike$Map.tryLeaf(ParIterableLike.scala:1053)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AdaptiveWorkStealingTasks$WrappedTask.internal(Tasks.scala:170)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AdaptiveWorkStealingTasks$WrappedTask.internal$(Tasks.scala:157)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AdaptiveWorkStealingForkJoinTasks$WrappedTask.internal(Tasks.scala:[440](https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/actions/runs/5049430617/jobs/9058875700#step:5:452))
	at scala.collection.parallel.AdaptiveWorkStealingTasks$WrappedTask.compute(Tasks.scala:150)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AdaptiveWorkStealingTasks$WrappedTask.compute$(Tasks.scala:149)
	at scala.collection.parallel.AdaptiveWorkStealingForkJoinTasks$WrappedTask.compute(Tasks.scala:440)
	at java.util.concurrent.RecursiveAction.exec(RecursiveAction.java:189)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692)
	at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:175)

[github-actions]

Internal ticket created : TS-392

[DMarinhoCodacy]

Hello @ben-manes

Thanks for reporting this.

Can you run codacy/codacy-analysis-cli-action@master instead of 5cc54a7? When you run the pipeline, it runs for a old version of cli-action 7.6.3 instead of 7.9.1, which is the latest version.

Kind regards,
David Marinho

[ben-manes]

I see, thanks. Can you perform regular releases? OSSF Scorecard will report unpinned actions as a supply chain vulnerability, where only hash versions are considered safe due to tag rewriting. It is easy to keep it updated using dependabot, and you can submit security incidents to github if a version is compromised. Otherwise there is a risk of a compromise like Codecov, SolarWinds, Jetbrains, etc. A dynamic version is really not in anyone's best interest.

[ben-manes]

The error still occurs with 7.9.1

https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/actions/runs/5138777500/jobs/9248461369#step:5:354