Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve precision and gas costs in_shareMochi #150

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Improve precision and gas costs in_shareMochi #150

code423n4 opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

pauliax

Vulnerability details

Impact

This not only loses some precision (cuz of multiplication and division) but also consumes more gas:
// send Mochi to vMochi Vault
mochi.transfer(
address(engine.vMochi()),
(mochiBalance * vMochiRatio) / 1e18
);
// send Mochi to veCRV Holders
mochi.transfer(
crvVoterRewardPool,
(mochiBalance * (1e18 - vMochiRatio)) / 1e18
);

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Proposed improvement:
// send Mochi to vMochi Vault
uint toVault = (mochiBalance * vMochiRatio) / 1e18;
mochi.transfer(
address(engine.vMochi()),
toVault
);
// send Mochi to veCRV Holders
mochi.transfer(
crvVoterRewardPool,
mochiBalance - toVault;
);

This way you the whole mochiBalance will be transferred and it will cost less to do that as fewer math operations are performed.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Oct 27, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
@r2moon r2moon added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Oct 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants