Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unbounded loops #358

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Unbounded loops #358

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

pauliax

Vulnerability details

Impact

There are several loops in the contract which can eventually grow so large as to make future operations of the contract cost too much gas to fit in a block, e.g.:

  for (uint256 i = replenishingIndex; i < auctionIds.length; i = i + 1) // function outstandingArbTokens()
  while (true) // function allocateArbRewards

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Consider introducing a reasonable upper limit based on block gas limits. Also, you can consider using EnumerableSet (https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/master/contracts/utils/structs/EnumerableSet.sol) where possible, e.g. 'buyers' or 'verifierList'.

@code423n4 code423n4 added 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working labels Dec 1, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
@0xScotch 0xScotch added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Dec 8, 2021
@GalloDaSballo
Copy link
Collaborator

Agree with the finding, would have preferred a list of occurencies though as this message doesn't help the sponsor mitigate

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants