Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a constant instead of block.timestamp for the deadline #117

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Use a constant instead of block.timestamp for the deadline #117

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization)

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

defsec

Vulnerability details

Impact

When doing swaps with a Uniswap router from within a contract, there's no need to compute any offset from the current block for the deadline parameter.
The router just checks if deadline >= block.timestamp.

Proof of Concept

  1. Navigate to the following contract.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/cf890dedf2e43ec787e8e5df65726316fda134a1/contracts/basket/contracts/singleJoinExit/SingleTokenJoinV2.sol#L109

Tools Used

None

Recommended Mitigation Steps

The most efficient way to provide deadlines for a router swap is to use a hardcoded value that is far in the future, for example, 1e10.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Dec 18, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant