Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing checks if pairs equal tokens #124

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Missing checks if pairs equal tokens #124

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation bug Something isn't working

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

defsec

Vulnerability details

Impact

The uniSwapLikeRouter.getAmountsOut, the contracts are not checking if the pairs are same.

Also, it does not check that the tokens actually match the pair.

It's easy to set faulty liquidation paths which then end up reverting the liquidation transactions.

Proof of Concept

  1. Navigate to the following contracts. Swap is completed through router. In the following contract,

There is check missing if the inputToken and outputToken is same.

"https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/main/contracts/basket/contracts/singleJoinExit/SingleTokenJoinV2.sol#L80"

Tools Used

None

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Check inputToken != outputToken.

@code423n4 code423n4 added 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working labels Dec 18, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2021
@0xleastwood
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe you would only cause your own tx to revert. So marking as non-critical.

@0xleastwood 0xleastwood added 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation and removed 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments labels Jan 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants