Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some tokens don't allow to set a non-zero approval from a non-zero approval #173

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

GiveMeTestEther

Vulnerability details

Impact

Some tokens need to first set the the approve amount to 0 to set it to a non-zero amount (USDT: https://etherscan.io/address/0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206994597c13d831ec7#code). This makes the _maxApprove() and the approve.selector calls incompatible to such tokens.

Proof of Concept

approve.selector:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/callManagers/RebalanceManagerV3.sol#L75
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/callManagers/RebalanceManagerV2.sol#L70
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/callManagers/RebalanceManager.sol#L131
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/callManagers/RebalanceManager.sol#L84

.approve():
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/singleJoinExit/SingleNativeTokenExit.sol#L39
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/singleJoinExit/SingleNativeTokenExitV2.sol#L50
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/singleJoinExit/SingleTokenJoin.sol#L38
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/98f6e2ff91f5fcebc0489f5871183566feaec307/contracts/basket/contracts/singleJoinExit/SingleTokenJoinV2.sol#L48

Tools Used

Recommended Mitigation Steps

  • set the approval amount to 0 before setting it to a non-zero amount
@code423n4 code423n4 added 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working labels Dec 19, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2021
@0xleastwood
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicate of #269

@0xleastwood 0xleastwood marked this as a duplicate of #269 Jan 23, 2022
@0xleastwood 0xleastwood added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Jan 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants