Skip to content

Issues: code-423n4/2022-01-dev-test-repo-findings

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

test issue 1st place grade-a QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax selected for report
#398 opened Apr 18, 2024 by Simon-Busch
Using block.timestamp as the deadline/expiry invites MEV satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") sponsor disputed Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue valid
#394 opened Dec 20, 2023 by code423n4
Return values of transfer()/transferFrom() not checked sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
#391 opened Dec 20, 2023 by code423n4
Array is push()ed but not pop()ed, and is iterated over bot-report bug Something isn't working disagree with severity Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments) ineligible for award
#388 opened Dec 20, 2023 by code423n4
Unchecked return value of low-level call()/delegatecall() 2 (Med Risk) bot-report bug Something isn't working disagree with severity Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments) ineligible for award
#383 opened Dec 20, 2023 by code423n4
_safeMint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible 2 (Med Risk) bot-report bug Something isn't working disagree with severity Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments) ineligible for award sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") sponsor disputed Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue
#377 opened Dec 20, 2023 by code423n4
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.