Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chainlink's latestRoundData might return stale or incorrect results #115

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists invalid This doesn't seem right out of scope

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-frax/blob/c4189a3a98b38c8c962c5ea72f1a322fbc2ae45f/src/contracts/FraxlendPairHelper.sol#L125-L149
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-frax/blob/c4189a3a98b38c8c962c5ea72f1a322fbc2ae45f/src/contracts/FraxlendPairCore.sol#L516-L547

Vulnerability details

Impact

Stale data from an oracle will lead to incorrect exchange rates.

Proof of Concept

In FraxlendPairHelper and FraxlendPairCore we are using latestRoundData() to retrieve exchange rate data from a Chainlink oracle but there is no check to ensure that the return value is not stale data. A problem with the oracle (consensus failure, network congestion, etc) could lead to stale return values which would create an incorrect exchange rate.

References:

Tools Used

Vscode

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Consider adding the following checks:

...
( uint80 roundId, int256 _answer, , uint256 updatedAt, uint80 answeredInRound ) = AggregatorV3Interface(XXXXX).latestRoundData();
require(_answer > 0, "Chainlink price <= 0");
require(updatedAt != 0, "Incomplete round");
require(answeredInRound >= roundId, "Stale price");
...
@code423n4 code423n4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Aug 17, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 17, 2022
@amirnader-ghazvini amirnader-ghazvini added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Aug 29, 2022
@amirnader-ghazvini
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicate of #179

@amirnader-ghazvini amirnader-ghazvini marked this as a duplicate of #179 Aug 29, 2022
@gititGoro gititGoro added invalid This doesn't seem right out of scope labels Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists invalid This doesn't seem right out of scope
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants