Analysis

[c4-submissions]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[c4-pre-sort]

141345 marked the issue as insufficient quality report

[alex-ppg]

The Analysis Report has been graded as C given that it falls in one of the below categories:

• Rudimentary listing of contracts and a textual description of them
• Rehash of data present in the documentation of the project as well as its website, and any other such resource
• Incorrect information or information that is very generic/vague and potentially inapplicable to the NextGen project
• Minimal data presented, or reiterating data of the Warden's submissions
• Findings better suited as part of a QA submission

[c4-judge]

alex-ppg marked the issue as grade-c

[Nabeel-javaid]

hey, kindly have another look at this analysis report as i've read the comments on the report and I would say that warden have listed all the information that is necessary for the analysis report and have also tried to list some extra info. IDK what do you mean by "vague" cause all the information is strictly in the domain of this project

[alex-ppg]

Hey @Nabeel-javaid, thanks for requesting additional background for this ruling!

I started by compiling a chapter-by-chapter grade of this submission, however, all chapters appear to be insufficient to acquire a grade. All chapters contain boilerplate text / generic that is not strictly applicable to NextGen and can be copy-pasted to apply to any project.

For example, the only NextGen-specific information in Codebase Quality Analysis is the two function names mentioned which do not indicate which contract they stem from.

The Suggestion for Decentralized Governance chapter was provided without any acknowledgment of the current ownership structure of NextGen nor mention of their use of a Gnosis Safe which the Sponsor had provided upon request to multiple other wardens.

The Mechanism Review chapter which is arguably the only NextGen-specific content in the Analysis falls into the Rehash of data present in the documentation of the project as well as its website, and any other such resource category. It offers no newfound insights, and also does not mention all ways an NFT can be minted/burned, such as burnOrSwapExternalToMint.

Based on the above, I maintain the C grade I have assigned for this Analysis. For more information on how Analysis reports should look, kindly consult the grade-A submissions as follows: #2005 #1888 #1841 #1563 #1472 #926 #772