Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The calculation of the "decreaserate" parameter is incorrect #308

Closed
c4-submissions opened this issue Nov 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-746 unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-submissions
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-nextgen/blob/8b518196629faa37eae39736837b24926fd3c07c/smart-contracts/MinterContract.sol#L551
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-nextgen/blob/8b518196629faa37eae39736837b24926fd3c07c/smart-contracts/MinterContract.sol#L546

Vulnerability details

Impact

It leads to incorrect price calculation.

Proof of Concept

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-nextgen/blob/8b518196629faa37eae39736837b24926fd3c07c/smart-contracts/MinterContract.sol#L546
tDiff = (block.timestamp - collectionPhases[_collectionId].allowlistStartTime) / collectionPhases[_collectionId].timePeriod;

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-nextgen/blob/8b518196629faa37eae39736837b24926fd3c07c/smart-contracts/MinterContract.sol#L551
decreaserate = ((price - (collectionPhases[_collectionId].collectionMintCost / (tDiff + 2))) / collectionPhases[_collectionId].timePeriod) * ((block.timestamp - (tDiff * collectionPhases[_collectionId].timePeriod) - collectionPhases[_collectionId].allowlistStartTime));

((block.timestamp - (tDiff * collectionPhases[_collectionId].timePeriod) - collectionPhases[_collectionId].allowlistStartTime))=0

so,decreaserate = 0

Tools Used

vscode

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Redesign the calculation formula for the "decreaserate" parameter.

Assessed type

Math

@c4-submissions c4-submissions added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Nov 5, 2023
c4-submissions added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

141345 marked the issue as duplicate of #746

@c4-judge
Copy link

c4-judge commented Dec 6, 2023

alex-ppg marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Invalid

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label Dec 6, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link

c4-judge commented Dec 9, 2023

alex-ppg marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Invalid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-746 unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants