Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No valid check given #779

Closed
c4-submissions opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

No valid check given #779

c4-submissions opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-619 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-submissions
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-nextgen/blob/8b518196629faa37eae39736837b24926fd3c07c/smart-contracts/MinterContract.sol#L233

Vulnerability details

Impact

msg.value check will pass if _numOfTokens is 0 even ,but it will get stuck at looping causing an error

Proof of Concept

require(msg.value >= (getPrice(col) * _numberOfTokens), "Wrong ETH");
       for(uint256 i = 0; i < _numberOfTokens; i++) {
           uint256 mintIndex = gencore.viewTokensIndexMin(col) + gencore.viewCirSupply(col);
           gencore.mint(mintIndex, mintingAddress, _mintTo, tokData, _saltfun_o, col, phase);
       }

Tools Used

Manual Review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Add a check before msg.value >= (getPrice(col) * _numberOfTokens)

Assessed type

Error

@c4-submissions c4-submissions added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Nov 10, 2023
c4-submissions added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

141345 marked the issue as insufficient quality report

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality label Nov 18, 2023
@c4-judge c4-judge closed this as completed Dec 6, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link

c4-judge commented Dec 6, 2023

alex-ppg marked the issue as duplicate of #619

@c4-judge
Copy link

c4-judge commented Dec 8, 2023

alex-ppg marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Invalid

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-619 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants