Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #625 [1702572208860] #629

Closed
c4-judge opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #625 [1702572208860] #629

c4-judge opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-231 unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #625 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows:

[03] Denial of tokenTransfers by frontRunning
Related to issue [2], a transfer of tokens can be denied by frontrunning, since registerTransfer revert if the positionKey_to already has liquidy.

@c4-judge c4-judge added the 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value label Dec 14, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picodes marked the issue as duplicate of #231

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picodes marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Out of scope

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label Dec 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-231 unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant