V9.0.0/prepare for launch #6
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 75.82% 78.01% +2.18%
==========================================
Files 25 24 -1
Lines 943 905 -38
Branches 120 111 -9
==========================================
- Hits 715 706 -9
+ Misses 226 197 -29
Partials 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj (1)
14-16: Consider documenting minimum required versions in commentsWhile centralized version management is good practice, it would be helpful to document the minimum required versions in comments for better maintainability and troubleshooting.
Add version comments like this:
<ItemGroup> - <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson" /> - <PackageReference Include="Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc" /> - <PackageReference Include="Cuemon.Extensions.IO" /> + <!-- Minimum required: 8.0.0 --> + <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson" /> + <!-- Minimum required: latest compatible version --> + <PackageReference Include="Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc" /> + <!-- Minimum required: latest compatible version --> + <PackageReference Include="Cuemon.Extensions.IO" /> </ItemGroup>CHANGELOG.md (4)
10-10: Update the release dateThe release date is set in the future. Consider using the actual release date or removing the date until the release is published.
Line range hint
14-16: Enhance the Added section descriptionConsider providing more context about the FailureConverter class:
- What specific failure data it handles
- Why it was added
- Benefits it brings to the project
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previou...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: The verb “was” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “were” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...hangelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Cuem...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WAS_WERE)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... introduced with .NET 9 preview releases so the final release is production ready t...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Line range hint
18-23: Standardize the Changed section formattingConsider standardizing the format:
- Use consistent verb tense (either "was extended" or just "extended")
- Use consistent breaking change marking (either inline or parentheses)
Example format:
- JsonConverterCollectionExtensions class in the Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Converters namespace was extended to include one new extension method: AddProblemDetailsConverter + JsonConverterCollectionExtensions class in the Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Converters namespace extended to include one new extension method: AddProblemDetailsConverter🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
22-22: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Line range hint
25-27: Add migration guidance for removed classFor breaking changes like removing
HttpExceptionDescriptorResponseHandlerExtensions, consider adding:
- Impact on existing code
- Migration path or alternatives for users
- Reason for removal
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
22-22: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (1)
92-92: LGTM! Consider adding test documentation.The changes maintain test consistency with the previous updates while preserving the distinct purpose of testing camelCase conversion.
Consider adding XML documentation to clarify the difference between this test and the PascalCase variant:
+ /// <summary> + /// Verifies that AddStringEnumConverter correctly serializes enums to camelCase strings + /// when no naming strategy is specified. + /// </summary> [Fact] public void AddStringEnumConverter_ShouldAddStringEnumConverterToConverterCollection()Also applies to: 113-114
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt(1 hunks)CHANGELOG.md(2 hunks)Directory.Build.props(2 hunks)Directory.Packages.props(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj(1 hunks)src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj(1 hunks)src/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj(1 hunks)src/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json/JsonReaderExtensions.cs(0 hunks)test/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensionsTest.cs(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json/JsonReaderExtensions.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~29-~29: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...BUTING.md) are welcome and encouraged. Feel free to submit issues, feature requests, or pul...
(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests.csproj (1)
9-9: Consider adding version constraints for the authentication package
While removing specific versions aligns with the PR objectives, having no version constraints for a security-sensitive authentication package could introduce risks. Consider:
- Adding a version constraint that matches the main project
- Ensuring compatibility when moving from preview version 9.0.0-preview.11 to the release version
Let's verify the version compatibility:
test/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests.csproj (2)
9-9: Verify package version management strategy
Removing version constraints in test projects could lead to inconsistent test results across different environments. Consider if we should:
- Keep a specific version for test stability
- Use version ranges to allow patches but prevent major updates
- Implement version control through central package management
✅ Verification successful
Package versioning is properly managed centrally
The removal of explicit version constraints in the test project is actually following best practices, as versions are managed centrally through Directory.Packages.props which specifies version 9.0.0-rc.1 for Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc. This ensures consistent versioning across all projects while maintaining a single source of truth for package versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Directory.Packages.props exists and contains version for this package
fd -t f "Directory.Packages.props" -x grep -l "Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc"
# Check other test projects for consistent version management
fd -t f "*.Tests.csproj" -x grep -A 1 -B 1 "Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc"
Length of output: 477
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Directory.Packages.props content
cat Directory.Packages.props
# Check test projects for package references using proper glob pattern
fd --glob "*.Tests.csproj" --exec grep -A 1 -B 1 "Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc" {}
Length of output: 2224
Line range hint 4-4: Verify .NET 9.0 test stability
Since .NET 9.0 is still in preview, ensure that:
- CI pipeline is configured to handle preview SDKs
- Test results are stable across both .NET 8.0 and 9.0
✅ Verification successful
✅ .NET 9.0 test configuration appears stable and well-supported
The verification shows that:
- CI pipeline is properly configured with
includePreview: truefor .NET SDK installation - Tests are consistently targeting .NET 9.0 across all test projects
- Build matrix includes .NET 9.0 framework testing on both Windows and Linux
- Common build properties in Directory.Build.props properly handle multi-targeting including .NET 9.0
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other test projects also target .NET 9.0
fd -t f "*.Tests.csproj" -x grep -l "net9.0"
# Check if CI workflow files exist and handle .NET 9.0
fd -t f "*.yml" -t f "*.yaml" -p ".github/workflows" -x grep -l "net9.0"
Length of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other test projects also target .NET 9.0
fd --glob "*.Tests.csproj" --type f --exec grep -l "net9.0" {} \;
# Check CI workflow files for .NET 9.0 handling
fd --glob "*.{yml,yaml}" --type f --base-directory .github/workflows --exec grep -l "net9.0" {} \;
# Also check global.json for SDK version constraints
if [ -f "global.json" ]; then
cat global.json
fi
# Check Directory.Build.props for common build properties
if [ -f "Directory.Build.props" ]; then
cat Directory.Build.props
fi
Length of output: 4761
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the CI pipeline configuration for .NET 9.0 SDK setup
cat .github/workflows/pipelines.yml
# Check if there are any failing tests or issues reported in recent commits
fd --glob "*.Tests.csproj" --type f --exec dirname {} \; | while read -r dir; do
if [ -f "$dir/TestResults" ]; then
ls -la "$dir/TestResults"
fi
done
# Look for any SDK version constraints or configurations
find . -type f -name "*.props" -o -name "*.targets" -o -name "global.json" | xargs grep -l "net9\|SDK"
Length of output: 6871
src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj (2)
Line range hint 3-5: Verify .NET 9.0 preview compatibility.
The project targets .NET 9.0 which is currently in preview. Ensure all dependencies are compatible with .NET 9.0 preview and consider documenting any preview-related considerations.
Run the following script to check .NET 9.0 compatibility across dependencies:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check .NET 9.0 compatibility in package references
# Look for target framework specifications and package references
# Check target frameworks across solution
echo "Checking target frameworks across solution:"
fd -e csproj -x grep -A 1 "TargetFrameworks\|TargetFramework"
# Check package references that might have framework constraints
echo -e "\nChecking package references with framework constraints:"
fd -e csproj -x grep -A 1 "PackageReference.*Condition"14-14: Consider adding version constraints for package stability.
While removing explicit version numbers aligns with the PR objectives, consider using version constraints (e.g., minimum version or version range) to prevent potential compatibility issues with future package updates.
Run the following script to check current package version constraints across the solution:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json.csproj (1)
14-16: Verify package versions are properly managed in Directory.Packages.props
The removal of explicit version specifications aligns with centralized package management practices. However, we should ensure these dependencies are properly configured.
Let's verify the version management setup:
✅ Verification successful
Package versions are properly managed in Directory.Packages.props
All the package versions are correctly defined in Directory.Packages.props:
- Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson: 9.0.0-rc.2.24474.3 (for .NET 9.0) and 8.0.10 (for .NET 8.0)
- Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc: 9.0.0-rc.1
- Cuemon.Extensions.IO: 9.0.0-rc.1
The removal of version specifications from the .csproj file is appropriate as the versions are centrally managed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if package versions are defined in Directory.Packages.props
# and verify the presence of version constraints for critical packages
# Check Directory.Packages.props for package versions
echo "Checking Directory.Packages.props for package versions..."
rg -A 1 "Microsoft\.AspNetCore\.Mvc\.NewtonsoftJson|Cuemon\.AspNetCore\.Mvc|Cuemon\.Extensions\.IO" Directory.*.props
# List all props files to ensure we're not missing any version definitions
echo -e "\nListing all props files in the repository..."
fd -e props
Length of output: 1159
Directory.Packages.props (4)
2-4: LGTM! Good practice using centralized package management.
Setting ManagePackageVersionsCentrally to true helps maintain consistent package versions across the solution.
16-20: Verify security implications of core dependencies
Critical dependencies need security verification:
- Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk (17.11.1)
- Newtonsoft.Json (13.0.3)
- System.Net.Http (4.3.4)
#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities in critical packages
for package in "Newtonsoft.Json" "System.Net.Http"
do
echo "Checking $package..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "'$package'") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
done27-32: Verify framework compatibility and version stability
The conditional targeting is good, but there are some concerns:
- .NET 9 is using RC version (9.0.0-rc.2.24474.3)
- Ensure .NET 8 version (8.0.10) is the latest stable release
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest versions for Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.aspnetcore.mvc.newtonsoftjson/index.json | jq '.versions[]' | grep -E "8\.0\.|9\.0\."6-15:
Caution: Using release candidate versions in production
Multiple packages are using version 9.0.0-rc.1. Consider waiting for the stable release before deploying to production, as release candidates may contain breaking changes or undiscovered issues.
Run this script to check for any reported issues with these RC versions:
Directory.Build.props (3)
76-84: Coverage tool configuration looks good
The configuration for coverlet tools is well-structured:
- Correct use of
PrivateAssets="all"to prevent dependency flow - Appropriate
IncludeAssetsspecification for build integration
72-75: Verify test framework compatibility
The removal of version attributes for test framework packages aligns with centralized version management. However, ensure version constraints in Directory.Packages.props maintain compatibility between:
- Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
- xunit
- xunit runners
Let's verify the test framework setup:
#!/bin/bash
# Check version constraints in Directory.Packages.props
if [ -f "Directory.Packages.props" ]; then
echo "Checking test framework version constraints..."
rg -A 2 "Microsoft\.NET\.Test\.Sdk|xunit" "Directory.Packages.props"
fi
# Check for any remaining explicit versions in test projects
fd -e csproj -x rg "Microsoft\.NET\.Test\.Sdk|xunit"45-46: Verify version constraints in Directory.Packages.props
The removal of version attributes for build-time tools is good for centralized version management. However, ensure that appropriate version constraints are defined in Directory.Packages.props to maintain consistent builds.
Let's verify the version management setup:
✅ Verification successful
Version constraints are properly defined in Directory.Packages.props
The version constraints for both packages are correctly defined in Directory.Packages.props:
- Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub: 8.0.0
- MinVer: 6.0.0
The removal of version attributes from Directory.Build.props is consistent with the centralized version management approach, and no other references with conflicting versions were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Directory.Packages.props exists and contains version constraints
if [ -f "Directory.Packages.props" ]; then
echo "Checking version constraints in Directory.Packages.props..."
rg -A 2 "Microsoft\.SourceLink\.GitHub|MinVer" "Directory.Packages.props"
else
echo "Warning: Directory.Packages.props not found"
fi
# Check if these packages are referenced elsewhere with versions
rg -g "*.props" -g "*.csproj" "Microsoft\.SourceLink\.GitHub|MinVer" .
Length of output: 1344
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (1)
25-25: LGTM! Test updates align with PR objectives.
The change from HorizontalDirection to DayOfWeek maintains the test's intent while using a more standard .NET enum. The assertions are correctly updated to match the new expected values.
Let's verify the test coverage for all enum values:
Also applies to: 47-48
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the test file content to better understand the test coverage and assertions.
Test coverage for enum serialization is sufficient
The test file demonstrates comprehensive coverage of the DayOfWeek enum serialization:
- Tests both PascalCase ("Saturday") and camelCase ("saturday") serialization
- Verifies converter capabilities (CanRead, CanWrite, CanConvert)
- Tests the core functionality of string enum conversion in both default and custom naming strategy scenarios
The change from HorizontalDirection to DayOfWeek is appropriate as:
- It maintains the same test coverage and assertions
- Uses a standard .NET enum which is more relatable
- Properly tests both naming conventions which is the primary purpose of these tests
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are tests covering other DayOfWeek enum values
# to ensure comprehensive test coverage
rg -A 5 "DayOfWeek\." test/
Length of output: 1867
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full test file content to analyze test methods and assertions
cat test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensionsTest.cs
Length of output: 12118
| # Breaking Changes | ||
| - RENAMED DynamicJsonConverter class in the Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json namespace to JsonConverterFactory |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider restructuring breaking changes section for better visibility.
The removal of .NET 6 support is a significant breaking change that should be prominently listed in the "Breaking Changes" section rather than under "ALM". This helps users quickly identify all breaking changes that might affect their applications.
Apply this diff to restructure the breaking changes section:
# Breaking Changes
- RENAMED DynamicJsonConverter class in the Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json namespace to JsonConverterFactory
+- REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6 (LTS) - Upgrade to .NET 8 or higher is required📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Breaking Changes | |
| - RENAMED DynamicJsonConverter class in the Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json namespace to JsonConverterFactory | |
| # Breaking Changes | |
| - RENAMED DynamicJsonConverter class in the Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json namespace to JsonConverterFactory | |
| - REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6 (LTS) - Upgrade to .NET 8 or higher is required |
| # Breaking Changes | ||
| - RENAMED DynamicJsonConverter class in the Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json namespace to JsonConverterFactory | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Breaking change details for ValidatorExtensions should be added
Based on the evidence from the codebase:
- The change was made to comply with SonarSource rule S3343 (Caller information parameters should come at the end of the parameter list)
- The breaking change affects the parameter order in
InvalidJsonDocumentmethods whereparamNamewas moved to be consistent with Microsoft's guard improvements - Users need to update their code if they're explicitly naming the
paramNameparameter in their method calls
Add these details to the breaking changes section:
# Breaking Changes
- RENAMED DynamicJsonConverter class in the Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json namespace to JsonConverterFactory
- REORDERED parameters in ValidatorExtensions.InvalidJsonDocument methods to comply with SonarSource rule S3343 - caller information parameters must be at the end. Update any code explicitly using named parameters.
🔗 Analysis chain
Provide more context for ValidatorExtensions breaking change.
The Quality Analysis section mentions a breaking change in ValidatorExtensions to comply with SonarSource rule S3343, but it doesn't explain the actual impact on consumers. Consider adding details about:
- What changed in the ValidatorExtensions class
- How this affects existing code
- What actions users need to take to migrate
Let's check the SonarSource rule and related changes:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find ValidatorExtensions changes and related files
# Find ValidatorExtensions implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class ValidatorExtensions {
$$$
}'
# Find tests that might show usage examples
rg -l "ValidatorExtensions" | grep -i "test"
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test file to understand the changes
cat test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/ValidatorExtensionsTest.cs
# Also search for any git history of this file
git log -p -- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Tests/ValidatorExtensionsTest.cs
# Look for the actual ValidatorExtensions implementation
rg -g "!*.Test*" "ValidatorExtensions" -A 5
Length of output: 9162
This pull request includes several changes to the
Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Jsonproject, focusing on updating dependencies, renaming classes, and improving package management. The most important changes are summarized below.Breaking Changes and Renaming:
DynamicJsonConverterclass toJsonConverterFactoryin theCodebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Jsonnamespace. [1] [2]Dependency Updates:
Directory.Build.props,Directory.Packages.props, and various.csprojfiles. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]Removal of Deprecated Code:
JsonReaderExtensionsclass from theCodebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Jsonproject.Documentation and Changelog:
CHANGELOG.mdto reflect the release date for version 9.0.0 and added notes on breaking changes and new features. [1] [2]README.mdto improve readability.Test Updates:
JsonConverterCollectionExtensionsTest.csto useDayOfWeekinstead ofHorizontalDirection. [1] [2] [3] [4]Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Version 9.0.0
New Features
FailureConverterto convert failure-related data to JSON.JsonConverterCollectionExtensionswithAddFailureConverterandAddProblemDetailsConvertermethods.Breaking Changes
DynamicJsonConvertertoJsonConverterFactory.JsonReaderExtensionsfile, removing theToHierarchymethod.Chores