Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V9.0.0/rtm #7

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

V9.0.0/rtm #7

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 13, 2024

This pull request includes several updates to the project to support .NET 9 and to update package versions from release candidates to stable versions.

.NET Version Updates:

Package Version Updates:

Docker Image Update:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated availability information to support .NET 9 alongside .NET 8 and .NET Standard 2.0.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Upgraded various package dependencies to stable versions, enhancing overall stability and performance.
  • Chores

    • Updated the Docker image for the testing environment to ensure compatibility with the latest versions.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to various files to reflect the support for .NET 9 alongside .NET 8 and .NET Standard 2.0. The availability information in documentation files has been revised accordingly. Additionally, several package dependencies in Directory.Packages.props have been upgraded from pre-release to stable versions, and the Docker image used in the testing environment has been updated to a newer version.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.docfx/includes/availability-default.md Updated availability from .NET 8, .NET 6 to .NET 9, .NET 8 while retaining .NET Standard 2.0.
.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md Updated availability from .NET 8, .NET 6 to .NET 9, .NET 8.
Directory.Packages.props Updated multiple package versions from pre-release (9.0.0-rc.1 and 9.0.0-rc.2.24474.3) to stable (9.0.0).
testenvironments.json Updated dockerImage for "Docker-Ubuntu" from a pre-release version to a stable version.

Possibly related PRs

  • V9.0.0/net9rc2 #4: The main PR updates availability information for .NET versions, while PR V9.0.0/net9rc2 #4 also updates the version of Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson to a stable version for .NET 9, indicating a direct relationship in terms of framework support updates.

🐇 In the meadow, where the code does gleam,
New versions hop in, like a fresh spring dream.
.NET 9 joins the dance, with 8 by its side,
Stable packages now, on this joyful ride.
With Docker updated, our tests will soar,
Hooray for the changes, let’s code even more! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09aa801 and b8fbee0.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-default.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (2 hunks)
  • testenvironments.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-default.md
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
  • testenvironments.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Directory.Packages.props (2)

6-15: Verify package availability and compatibility

The update from RC to stable versions looks good, maintaining version consistency across related packages. However, let's verify the availability of these packages.


28-28: Verify .NET 9 RTM package compatibility

The update to the stable version 9.0.0 for .NET 9 targets is appropriate. However, let's verify compatibility with the fixed Newtonsoft.Json version (13.0.3).


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.01%. Comparing base (09aa801) to head (b8fbee0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #7   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.01%   78.01%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines         905      905           
  Branches      111      111           
=======================================
  Hits          706      706           
  Misses        197      197           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 6c566d8 into main Nov 13, 2024
21 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.0/rtm branch November 13, 2024 05:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant