Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

Bump junit from 3.8.2 to 4.13.2 #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2021

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 15, 2021

Bumps junit from 3.8.2 to 4.13.2.

Release notes

Sourced from junit's releases.

JUnit 4.13.2

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13.1

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13 RC 2

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13 RC 1

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13 Beta 3

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13 Beta 2

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.13 Beta 1

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.12

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.12 Beta 3

Please refer to the release notes for details.

JUnit 4.12 Beta 2

No release notes provided.

JUnit 4.12 Beta 1

No release notes provided.

JUnit 4.11

No release notes provided.

Changelog

Sourced from junit's changelog.

Summary of changes in version 4.13.2

Rules

[Pull request #1687:](junit-team/junit#1687) Mark ThreadGroups created by FailOnTimeout as daemon groups

In JUnit 4.13 ([pull request #1517](junit-team/junit4#1517)) an attempt was made to fix leakage of the ThreadGroup instances created when a test is run with a timeout. That change explicitly destroyed the ThreadGroup that was created for the time-limited test. Numerous people reported problems that were caused by explicitly destroying the ThreadGroup.

In this change, the code was updated to call ThreadGroup.setDaemon(true) instead of destroying the ThreadGroup.

Pull request $1691: Only create ThreadGroups if FailOnTimeout.lookForStuckThread is true.

In JUnit 4.12 ([pull request #742](junit-team/junit4#742)) the Timeout Rule was updated to optionally display the stacktrace of the thread that appears to be stuck (enabled on an opt-in basis by passing true to Timeout.Builder.lookForStuckThread(boolean)). When that change was made, time-limited tests were changed to start the new thread in a new ThreadGroup, even if the test did not call lookForStuckThread(). This subtle change in behavior resulted in visible behavior changes to some tests (for example, tests of code that uses java.beans.ThreadGroupContext).

In this change, the code is updated to only create a new ThreadGroup if the caller calls Timeout.Builder.lookForStuckThread(true). Tests with timeouts that do not make this call will behave as they did in JUnit 4.11 (and more similar to tests that do not have a timeout). This unfortunately could result in visible changes of tests written or updated since the 4.12 release. If this change adversely affects your tests, you can create the Timeout rule via the builder and call Timeout.Builder.lookForStuckThread(true).

Exceptions

[Pull request #1654:](junit-team/junit#1654) Fix for issue #1192: NotSerializableException with AssumptionViolatedException

This change fixes an issue where AssumptionViolatedException instances could not be serialized if they were created with a constructor that takes in an org.hamcrest.Matcher instance (these constructors are used if you use one of the assumeThat() methods in org.junit.Assume).

Commits
  • 05fe2a6 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release r4.13.2
  • ff57344 Add build for JDK 17-ea
  • 02aaa01 Improve check that thread is stopped
  • e9a75f4 Merge test for exception type and message
  • d27ad52 Rename DelegateStatement to DelegatingStatement
  • b83dc2e Better name for test that stops statement
  • 527f3a3 Replace InfiniteLoop with RunForASecond
  • 2db6394 Tidy up FailOnTimeoutTest
  • 64634e1 Update 4.13.2 release notes to document pull 1654
  • f8ee412 Fix serialization of AssumptionViolatedException (#1654)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code labels Feb 15, 2021
@slachiewicz slachiewicz merged commit 886744c into master Apr 12, 2021
@slachiewicz slachiewicz deleted the dependabot/maven/junit-junit-4.13.2 branch April 12, 2021 22:31
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant