Fix fancy link - issue #1160 #1164
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to various components in the application. Key updates include the implementation of image upload handling and improved error handling in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@amankumarconnect is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Hello @amankumarconnect, thanks for opening your first Pull Request. The maintainers will review this Pull Request and provide feedback as soon as possible. Keep up the great work! |
amankumarconnect
temporarily deployed
to
production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (1)
41-43: LGTM: Consistent styling appliedThe styling changes are consistent with the previous anchor element, which is good for maintaining visual consistency throughout the component.
However, consider refactoring these repeated class names into a custom Tailwind CSS class or a reusable React component to adhere to the DRY principle and improve maintainability.
Example refactoring:
- Create a custom Tailwind class in your
tailwind.config.js:module.exports = { theme: { extend: { // other extensions... }, }, plugins: [ // other plugins... function({ addComponents, theme }) { addComponents({ '.fancy-link': { '@apply cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500': {} }, }) }, ], }
- Use the custom class in your component:
<a href="https://www.markdownguide.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" className="fancy-link" > markdownguide </a>This approach would centralize the styling definition while still keeping it component-specific, making future updates easier.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- app/(app)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (2 hunks)
- styles/globals.css (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- styles/globals.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (1)
32-34: LGTM: Successful transition to component-specific stylingThe change from the global
.fancy-linkclass to Tailwind CSS utility classes aligns perfectly with the PR objective of transitioning away from global styles. The new classes effectively replicate the previous styling while improving maintainability and making the component's appearance more explicit.components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1)
148-148: Excellent implementation of component-based styling!The updated className for the "Read full article" link successfully transitions away from global styles (
.fancy-link) to component-specific Tailwind CSS classes. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of moving towards a component-based styling approach.The new styling effectively replicates and enhances the previous design, maintaining visual consistency while improving maintainability. The use of Tailwind CSS classes for gradients, text transparency, and hover effects demonstrates a good understanding of the framework's capabilities.
app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (1)
42-44: LGTM: Styling change aligns with PR objectives.The modification to the "return home" link styling successfully transitions away from global styles, as outlined in the PR objectives. The new Tailwind CSS utility classes effectively replicate the fancy link appearance while keeping the styling component-specific. This change maintains consistency with other components mentioned in the PR summary.
| @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ const Create = () => { | |||
| href="https://www.markdownguide.org/" | |||
| target="_blank" | |||
| rel="noopener noreferrer" | |||
| className="fancy-link" | |||
| className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated inline styles into a reusable component or class
The className attributes on lines 799 and 808 are identical and contain lengthy Tailwind CSS classes. To improve maintainability and reduce duplication, consider creating a reusable component or extracting these common styles into a custom utility class using Tailwind's @apply directive.
Also applies to: 808-808
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @amankumarconnect
Can you please run the prettier script, and commit the changes. Thanks.
npm run prettier:fix
amankumarconnect
temporarily deployed
to
production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
@John-Paul-Larkin I ran the script and committed the changes. |
|
Closing this as the author wasn't assigned the issue. |
|
My apologies, @NiallJoeMaher. I wasn’t aware that working on an already assigned issue wasn’t allowed. I mistakenly thought that the assignment would be given to whoever opened a PR first. Thank you for pointing that out! |
|
@NiallJoeMaher |
|
@amankumarconnect I removed the spam label since it seems like an honest mistake. It's general knowledge in Open Source that you need to be assigned an issue to work on it to stop multiple people working on/rushing or racing to finish issues. Feel free to comment on another unassigned issue if you want to tackle it. |
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Fixes #1160
Pull Request details
cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500
Any Breaking changes
None
Associated Screenshots
None