Elixir client for the ACME certificate management protocol RFC8555 used by Let's Encrypt and other certification authorities.
This library was designed for bulk registration, and it supports HTTP and DNS authorization. It has been used to register millions of certificates.
Add acme_client to the list of dependencies in mix.exs:
def deps do
[
{:acme_client, "~> 0.1.0"}
]
endOne tricky thing about the ACME API is that it is paranoid about replay attacks. Every request that you make to the API needs to have a unique nonce. Every response from the API has a new nonce, passed in a header.
First create a session, then call the newNonce API to get an initial
nonce. Use that nonce when calling the API. Take the nonce from that API response
and use it to call another API function, and so on.
Functions in this library keep track of the nonce in the session. So you make a an API call with a session parameter, then use the returned session to make the next call.
Before making API calls, you first need to generate a cryptographic account key
(account_key). You then create an account on the server, identified by an
account key id, account_kid, a URL on the server.
Generate an account key:
{:ok, account_key} = AcmeClient.generate_account_key()The account_key is a struct. After generating it, you would normally save
it as a secret for your app. The following functions convert the struct to and
from a binary string.
# Convert key struct into string
account_key_bin = AcmeClient.key_to_binary(account_key)
# Convert string to key struct
account_key_bin = Application.get_env(:acme_client, :account_key)
account_key = AcmeClient.binary_to_key(account_key_bin)Create an account on the ACME service:
opts = [
account_key: account_key,
contact: "mailto:jake@example.com",
terms_of_service_agreed: true,
]
{:ok, session} = AcmeClient.new_session(account_key: account_key)
{:ok, session} = AcmeClient.new_nonce(session)
{:ok, session, account} = AcmeClient.new_account(session, opts)
%{url: account_kid} = accountAcmeClient.create_session/1 is a convenience function which creates a session
and gets the initial nonce.
{:ok, session} = AcmeClient.create_session(account_key: account_key, account_kid: account_kid)If you call it with no parameters, it reads them from the application environment.
{:ok, session} = AcmeClient.create_session()Call AcmeClient.new_order/2 to create an "order" for a certificate.
account_key and account_kid must be set in the session.
{:ok, session, order} = AcmeClient.new_order(session, identifiers: ["example.com", "*.example.com"])
%{url: order_url} = orderThe identifiers key is a domain or list of domains, either binary value or
type/value map.
On success, it returns a map where url is the URL of the created order and
object has its attributes. Make sure to keep track of the URL, or it may be
impossible to complete the order, as the Let's Encrypt API does not support the
RFC8555 API functions to get the outstanding orders for an acount.
The order response has an authorization URL for each domain name in the cert. The authorization manages challenge responses which are used to prove that you control the domain.
Create challenge responses from the order:
{:ok, session, authorizations} = AcmeClient.create_challenge_responses(session, order.object)The authorizations response looks like this:
[
{"https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/authz-v3/9808703214",
%{
"challenges" => [
%{
"response" => "OVO9-UEgCnCE-CEYj7hpC2_gy05Ml66bIJFmU3fnBWs",
"status" => "pending",
"token" => "pYbfjFiJ7L_1DuY3Ms08dCRCFDe97QtsIUj4YNOJrt0",
"type" => "dns-01",
"url" => "https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/chall-v3/9808703214/Ql5IRA"
}
],
"expires" => "2023-12-09T02:03:19Z",
"identifier" => %{"type" => "dns", "value" => "example.com"},
"status" => "pending",
"wildcard" => true
}},
{"https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/authz-v3/9808703224",
%{
"challenges" => [
%{
"response" => "HlCVDL_pvaxRQCnRPuo1Ho3BB2TLVUdtpF1Eq1w1yO4.n044yF8YRKXAnnngt4DzcvUvIN-Wqqn_QtnEhxwGK7g",
"status" => "pending",
"token" => "HlCVDL_pvaxRQCnRPuo1Ho3BB2TLVUdtpF1Eq1w1yO4",
"type" => "http-01",
"url" => "https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/chall-v3/9808703224/9bBUqQ"
},
%{
"response" => "ySf4juzz6S-QpB3n-5GmfElp-u0r1KJ9kgr8IQwXRSw",
"status" => "pending",
"token" => "HlCVDL_pvaxRQCnRPuo1Ho3BB2TLVUdtpF1Eq1w1yO4",
"type" => "dns-01",
"url" => "https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/chall-v3/9808703224/xc7_MA"
},
%{
"status" => "pending",
"token" => "HlCVDL_pvaxRQCnRPuo1Ho3BB2TLVUdtpF1Eq1w1yO4",
"type" => "tls-alpn-01",
"url" => "https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/chall-v3/9808703224/pvUx0Q"
}
],
"expires" => "2023-12-09T02:03:19Z",
"identifier" => %{"type" => "dns", "value" => "example.com"},
"status" => "pending"
}}
]}
This library supports two challenge response mechanisms, DNS and HTTP.
For DNS, you create a DNS TXT record with the response to the challenge, and the ACME service does a lookup to verify that the response it is expecting is there.
_acme-challenge.www.example.com. 300 IN TXT <response>
For HTTP, the ACME service makes an HTTP request to your web server at a "well known" URL, verifying that the response is there.
http://example.com/.well-known/acme-challenge/<response>
For DNS validation, get the dns-01 responses in DNS format:
for {_authorization, %{"identifier" => identifier, "challenges" => challenges}} <- authorizations,
%{"type" => "dns-01", "response" => response} <- challenges
do
{AcmeClient.dns_challenge_name(identifier), response}
end
[
{"_acme-challenge.example.com", "OVO9-UEgCnCE-CEYj7hpC2_gy05Ml66bIJFmU3fnBWs"},
{"_acme-challenge.example.com", "ySf4juzz6S-QpB3n-5GmfElp-u0r1KJ9kgr8IQwXRSw"}
]Create DNS TXT records.
For HTTP validation, get the http-01 responses:
for {_authorization, %{"identifier" => %{"value" => domain}, "challenges" => challenges}} <- authorizations,
%{"type" => "http-01", "response" => response, "token" => token} <- challenges
do
{"http://#{domain}" <> AcmeClient.http_challenge_url(token), response}
end
[
{"http://example.com/.well-known/acme-challenge/HlCVDL_pvaxRQCnRPuo1Ho3BB2TLVUdtpF1Eq1w1yO4",
"HlCVDL_pvaxRQCnRPuo1Ho3BB2TLVUdtpF1Eq1w1yO4.n044yF8YRKXAnnngt4DzcvUvIN-Wqqn_QtnEhxwGK7g"}
]Add AcmeClient.Phoenix.Plug to your Phoenix Endpoint.
plug AcmeClient.Phoenix.Plug, /var/lib/foo/acme-client/http_challenge_responses.bertTODO:
The initial order creation is synchronous, but the remaining steps involve communicating with the ACME service, waiting for it to take action and become ready, then taking the next step.
That is handled by starting a AcmeClient.Poller process for the order.
From RFC8555:
Order objects are created in the "pending" state. Once all of the authorizations listed in the order object are in the "valid" state, the order transitions to the "ready" state. The order moves to the "processing" state after the client submits a request to the order's "finalize" URL and the CA begins the issuance process for the certificate. Once the certificate is issued, the order enters the "valid" state. If an error occurs at any of these stages, the order moves to the "invalid" state. The order also moves to the "invalid" state if it expires or one of its authorizations enters a final state other than "valid" ("expired", "revoked", or "deactivated").
State Transitions for Order Objects:
pending --------------+
| |
| All authz |
| "valid" |
V |
ready ---------------+
| |
| Receive |
| finalize |
| request |
V |
processing ------------+
| |
| Certificate | Error or
| issued | Authorization failure
V V
valid invalid
Authorization objects are created in the "pending" state. If one of the challenges listed in the authorization transitions to the "valid" state, then the authorization also changes to the "valid" state. If the client attempts to fulfill a challenge and fails, or if there is an error while the authorization is still pending, then the authorization transitions to the "invalid" state. Once the authorization is in the "valid" state, it can expire ("expired"), be deactivated by the client ("deactivated", see Section 7.5.2), or revoked by the server ("revoked").
State Transitions for Authorization Objects:
pending --------------------+
| |
Challenge failure | |
or | |
Error | Challenge valid |
+---------+---------+ |
| | |
V V |
invalid valid |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------+--------------+
| | |
| | |
Server | Client | Time after |
revoke | deactivate | "expires" |
V V V
revoked deactivated expired
Challenge objects are created in the "pending" state. They transition to the "processing" state when the client responds to the challenge (see Section 7.5.1) and the server begins attempting to validate that the client has completed the challenge. Note that within the "processing" state, the server may attempt to validate the challenge multiple times (see Section 8.2). Likewise, client requests for retries do not cause a state change. If validation is successful, the challenge moves to the "valid" state; if there is an error, the challenge moves to the "invalid" state.
State Transitions for Challenge Objects:
pending
|
| Receive
| response
V
processing <-+
| | | Server retry or
| | | client retry request
| +----+
|
|
Successful | Failed
validation | validation
+---------+---------+
| |
V V
valid invalid
State Transitions for Order Objects:
pending --------------+
| |
| All authz |
| "valid" |
V |
ready ---------------+
| |
| Receive |
| finalize |
| request |
V |
processing ------------+
| |
| Certificate | Error or
| issued | Authorization failure
V V
valid invalid
Documentation can be found at https://hexdocs.pm/acme_client.
Differences between RFC8555 and Let's Encrypt implementation: https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/blob/master/docs/acme-divergences.md