Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add deadzone parameters for pathplanner #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Gernby
Copy link

@Gernby Gernby commented Jun 14, 2019

This is related to another PR I'll be submitting later today.

This is related to another PR I'll be submitting later today.
@geohot
Copy link
Collaborator

geohot commented Jun 15, 2019

So I looked at the other PR, it has cereal changes besides this. Also, comments and more description for me to be able to intelligently respond! "This is related to another PR I'll be submitting later today." isn't a description.

@Gernby
Copy link
Author

Gernby commented Jun 16, 2019

Thanks for the response. I actually need to close this PR, since I closed the related PR. However, I'm still a bit unsure about the purpose or goal of submitting cereal parameters separately in this repo. It seems that the only benefit of this being separate would be to improve Comma's data processing from custom forks. If so, then it seems that the requirements for new parameters should be pretty light, with quick turn-around time. If a new parameter requires detailed justification with supporting data, then it seems that this repo just increases effort for everyone.

@geohot geohot closed this Jun 27, 2019
krkeegan pushed a commit to krkeegan/cereal that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2021
devtekve pushed a commit to devtekve/cereal that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2023
* Cereal: Use custom reserved structs

* LongitudinalPersonality

* sync with upstream

* LongitudinalPersonalitySP defined

* rearrange

* no more
0312birdzhang pushed a commit to orapilot/cereal that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants