-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unable to extract from signature when long keys are used in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf #1952
Comments
dysinger
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 25, 2016
OpenPGP Key ID is the least reliable way to identify a key. From the spec: "Note that it is possible for there to be collisions of Key IDs -- two different keys with the same Key ID. Note that there is a much smaller, but still non-zero, probability that two different keys have the same fingerprint." resolves #1952
The GPG key-id long form doesn't work with stack. We should switch to using full fingerprints all the time. |
dysinger
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2016
OpenPGP Key ID is the least reliable way to identify a key. From the spec: "Note that it is possible for there to be collisions of Key IDs -- two different keys with the same Key ID. Note that there is a much smaller, but still non-zero, probability that two different keys have the same fingerprint." resolves #1952
Corrected for < 7.10 and misc cleanup |
Added P1 because it's broken right now |
dysinger
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2016
OpenPGP Key ID is the least reliable way to identify a key. From the spec: "Note that it is possible for there to be collisions of Key IDs -- two different keys with the same Key ID. Note that there is a much smaller, but still non-zero, probability that two different keys have the same fingerprint." resolves #1952
This was referenced Mar 31, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If you are using the keyid-form 0xlong the text output format changes for gpg signing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: