aravis: use version range for libxml2, remove old version #23669
Conversation
Conan v1 pipeline ✔️All green in build 1 (
Conan v2 pipeline ✔️
All green in build 1 ( |
| @@ -72,8 +66,8 @@ def layout(self): | |||
|
|
|||
| def requirements(self): | |||
| # glib-object.h and gio/gio.h are used in several public headers | |||
| self.requires("glib/2.78.1", transitive_headers=True) | |||
| self.requires("libxml2/2.12.3") | |||
| self.requires("glib/2.78.3", transitive_headers=True) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We're looking into version ranges for glib, as right now half its dependants conflict with eachother, and is looking promising for now, sorry for the delay on getting this one thru while we review that :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are now 12 recipes using 2.78.3 and 7 using 2.78.1, so even if not using version ranges yet for glib, it looks we can move forward this PR
| @@ -72,8 +66,8 @@ def layout(self): | |||
|
|
|||
| def requirements(self): | |||
| # glib-object.h and gio/gio.h are used in several public headers | |||
| self.requires("glib/2.78.1", transitive_headers=True) | |||
| self.requires("libxml2/2.12.3") | |||
| self.requires("glib/2.78.3", transitive_headers=True) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are now 12 recipes using 2.78.3 and 7 using 2.78.1, so even if not using version ranges yet for glib, it looks we can move forward this PR
|
Could we move forward with this? I already almost created a new PR :) Your efforts are appreciated. |
|
Hi @eudoxos thanks for the ping, I've now approved this PR to get merged, sorry for the delay :) |
Specify library name and version: aravis/all
libxml2<2.12.5 has known security issues. We can now use version range: c.f. #23277