Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add label-studio #27106

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

moritzwilksch
Copy link
Contributor

@moritzwilksch moritzwilksch commented Jul 26, 2024

... and a bunch of its dependencies

this isn't quite there yet. The initial build yields:

Could not solve for environment specs
The following packages are incompatible
├─ django-cors-headers 3.6.0.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ django-csp 3.7.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ django-model-utils 4.1.1.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ django-rq 2.5.1.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ drf-dynamic-fields 0.3.0.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ drf-flex-fields 0.9.5.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ drf-generators 0.3.0.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ humansignal-drf-yasg >=1.21.9  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ label-studio-converter 0.0.58.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ launchdarkly-server-sdk 8.2.1.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ rq 1.10.1.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
├─ rules 2.2.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel);
└─ xmljson 0.2.0.*  does not exist (perhaps a typo or a missing channel).

Bumps

TBD: does this break everything?

  • bump django-cors-headers >=3.6.0 (older version not on conda forge)
  • bump django-model-utils >= 4.1.1 (4.1.1 version not on conda forge, 4.0.0 -> 4.3.1)
  • bump drf-dynamic-fileds >= 0.3.0 (only version on conda forge is 0.4.0)
  • bump drf-flex-fields >= 0.9.5 (older version not on conda forge, oldest one on CF is 1.0.0)
  • bump drf-generators >= 0.3.0 (older version not on conda forge, oldest one on CF is 0.5.0)
  • bump launchdarkly-server-sdk >= 8.2.1 (older version not on conda forge, oldest one on CF is 9.0.0)
  • bump rq >= 1.10.1 (1.10.1 version not on conda forge, 1.9.0 -> 1.15.1)
  • bump rules >= 2.2.* (older version not on conda forge, oldest one on CF is 3.3)
  • bump xmljson >= 0.2.0 (older version not on conda forge, oldest one on CF is 0.2.1)
  • bump redis-py >=3.5.0,<3.6.0 to >= 4.0.0 due to minimum requirements by rq

Blockers

To Check

Checklist

  • Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
  • License file is packaged (see here for an example).
  • Source is from official source.
  • Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
  • If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
  • Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
  • Build number is 0.
  • A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
  • GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
  • When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/attr/meta.yaml, recipes/django-csp/meta.yaml, recipes/humansignal-drf-yasg/meta.yaml, recipes/label-studio/meta.yaml, recipes/label-studio-converter/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/attr/meta.yaml:

  • Feedstock with the same name exists in conda-forge.
  • noarch: python recipes are required to have a lower bound on the python version. Typically this means putting python >=3.6 in both host and run but you should check upstream for the package's Python compatibility.

For recipes/django-csp/meta.yaml:

  • The home item is expected in the about section.
  • noarch: python recipes are required to have a lower bound on the python version. Typically this means putting python >=3.6 in both host and run but you should check upstream for the package's Python compatibility.

For recipes/humansignal-drf-yasg/meta.yaml:

  • License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

For recipes/label-studio-converter/meta.yaml:

  • The license item is expected in the about section.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/django-csp/meta.yaml, recipes/humansignal-drf-yasg/meta.yaml, recipes/label-studio/meta.yaml, recipes/label-studio-converter/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/humansignal-drf-yasg/meta.yaml:

  • License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

For recipes/label-studio-converter/meta.yaml:

  • The license item is expected in the about section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant