Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Include custom build for DEVELOPMENT.md #322

Merged

Conversation

BbolroC
Copy link
Member

@BbolroC BbolroC commented Jan 16, 2024

The DEVELOPMENT.md does not cover a case where a user wants to build/test a custom operator/payload image. This is to supplement the case. This also covers an update on the incorrect information for s390x e2e test.

This PR should be merged after an e2e test for s390x in #295 runs properly.

Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com

@BbolroC
Copy link
Member Author

BbolroC commented Jan 18, 2024

The e2e test for s390x runs successfully (https://github.com/confidential-containers/operator/actions/runs/7564405180)

@stevenhorsman
Copy link
Member

@BbolroC - can you re-based this to pick up the latest CI changes please (though I know it's doc, so not likely to impact them). Thanks

Copy link
Member

@stevenhorsman stevenhorsman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks

popd
```

Additionally, there are alternative patch layers such as `peer-pods` or `s390x` in addition to the `default` layer. You may switch the directory accordingly based on your requirements.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @BbolroC !

Not sure if you really meant patch layers or path layers. In any case, kustomize uses the jargon "overlay" to mean those directories, i.e., those are "kustomize overlay directories".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the info. I will update the doc. 😉

The DEVELOPMENT.md lacks a case where a user wants to build/test a custom operator/payload image.
This is to supplement those instructions for the case. This also covers an update on the incorrect
information for s390x e2e test.

Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
Copy link
Member

@dcmiddle dcmiddle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks good to me, but I have not directly tested the Kind instructions.

Copy link
Member

@wainersm wainersm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @BbolroC !

@wainersm wainersm merged commit 2eb6d96 into confidential-containers:main Jan 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@BbolroC BbolroC deleted the update-doc-custom-build branch January 18, 2024 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants